News Abortion

Constituents Demand Utah Governor Veto New 72 Hour Waiting Period

Robin Marty

Utah's new three day abortion wait isn't law yet, and pressure is on the governor to make sure it never is.

Utah’s state legislature has passed a bill that will make it the second state to require women to wait 72 hours after meeting with a doctor before they can have an abortion.  But the legislation is still waiting for the governor’s signature, and many Utah citizens are anxious that he not sign.

From The Republic:

Thousands of emails have poured into Gov. Gary Herbert’s office, urging him to veto bills mandating abstinence-only sex education, banning filming on farms and extending the waiting period for abortions… Planned Parenthood of Utah executive director Karrie Galloway said the [waiting period] bill is similar to a law put on hold by a judge in South Dakota. Galloway said they have sent a letter to Herbert requesting a veto, but if he signs it they will consider a lawsuit.

Also campaigning for a veto?  The Utah PTA, who hopes the governor will refuse to sign a new law that will make it impossible for teachers to discuss homosexuality, contraception, or even premarital sex in any sex-ed classes.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:


News Abortion

Study: Utah’s Forced 72-Hour Waiting Period Dissuades Few, Raises Abortion Care Costs

Nicole Knight

One survey respondent was pushed beyond the abortion care facility’s gestational limit because of the GOP-backed 72-hour waiting period.

New research shows that Utah’s 72-hour forced waiting period doesn’t dissuade the vast majority of those seeking abortion care, it just makes the procedure more difficult and expensive to obtain.

The March study, published in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, reports that 86 percent of the pregnant people surveyed ended their pregnancies, with most reporting average waits of eight days between the initial visit and the procedure. Making two visits increased the cost of abortion care by about 10 percent.

Utah requires an in-person counseling visit at least 72 hours before abortion services, necessitating two separate visits. The state was the nation’s first to enact a 72-hour waiting period in 2012. GOP-majority legislatures in South Dakota, Missouri, Oklahoma, and North Carolina have also mandated 72-hour delays. Holidays and weekends don’t count in South Dakota’s 72-hour waiting period.

In 2013 and 2014, members of the research group Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health at the University of California, San Francisco, surveyed 500 pregnant people who were seeking abortion care at four Utah abortion providers.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:


Eight percent of the 309 respondents who completed follow-up surveys reported they were no longer seeking abortion care, but most “had been conflicted at the information visit.” Three percent had miscarried or found out that they weren’t pregnant, and two percent said they were still seeking abortion care. One respondent, a 26-year-old who had given birth once before, was pushed beyond the facility’s gestational limit because of the GOP-backed 72-hour waiting period.

Those surveyed spoke frankly about the emotional toll of the state-mandated 72-hour delay, expressing “frustration at being powerless to implement their decision.” Researchers noted that few of those surveyed seemed conflicted about having an abortion, suggesting the “72-hour waiting requirement seems to have been unnecessary.”

A 22-year-old told researchers, “I had to wait like a week and a half. That was killing me. I’m a person that wants to get everything over and done with once I’ve made a decision, so that was hard. I wanted it over and done with to move on with my life.”

An 18-year-old expressed similar frustration: “Knowing that I had to wait after deciding what I wanted to do and not having control over my own life and my body made me mad.”

Karrie Galloway, CEO and president of Planned Parenthood Association of Utah, told Rewire that the health-care provider has tried to soften the impact of the forced delay on pregnant people by offering so-called informed consent sessions at eight facilities around the state, “so a woman doesn’t have to drive all the way to Salt Lake City from St. George, which is a five-to-six hour drive away in southern Utah.”

Denise Danley, a call center lead with Planned Parenthood Association of Utah, told Rewire that the researchers’ findings mirror what she hears from callers seeking abortion care.

“They have typically already done significant research about the abortion process and have carefully considered their decision,” Danley said in an email. “Making arrangements such as needing to schedule time off at work, finding transportation, and potentially needing to schedule childcare for multiple appointments is quite stressful for women as it adds to the total cost of the abortion.”

Researchers found that those who had an abortion spent a mean of $44 on costs related to the consultation visit, $103 on costs related to the abortion care appointment, and paid a mean of $387 for the abortion procedure. The mean household income of respondents was $22,000.

Danley said she often hears from callers who didn’t realize they were pregnant right away because they were taking birth control to prevent an unintended pregnancy.

“There is not much ambiguity with these women, they were responsibly taking active steps to prevent pregnancy and birth control failure, and a waiting period does not change their mind about their readiness to parent,” Danley said.

Utah had a 24-hour waiting period prior to 2012. But lawmakers in the state’s Republican-held legislature argued that a longer delay was needed to allow a “woman who’s facing that decision to fully weigh her options and the implications of that decision,” as a spokeswoman for Gov. Gary Herbert told Reuters.

“When a woman decides to end a pregnancy, she has made a carefully considered decision—a decision in which politicians have no business to interfere,” Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, noted in a statement following the study’s release. “This study found that too often a woman in need of an abortion in Utah must scramble to find more money for the procedure, make additional travel and childcare arrangements, and then wait for days—in most cases, more than a week—to end a pregnancy. This is unacceptable, and why we fight bills like these whenever they are introduced.”

News Abortion

Utah Republicans Back Medically Dubious ‘Fetal Anesthesia’ Bill

Nicole Knight

Utah Republicans aim to enshrine the notion of "fetal pain" into state law with a measure requiring abortion providers to anesthetize a fetus before abortion care.

Utah Republicans aim to enshrine the notion of “fetal pain” into state law with a measure requiring abortion providers to anesthetize a fetus before abortion care.

Abortion rights opponents in multiple states have advanced or enacted unconstitutional 20-week bans on abortion services under the guise of preventing a fetus at that gestational stage from “feeling pain.” The medical establishment debunks the notion, charging that “fetal pain” is “unlikely before the third trimester.”

The Utah GOP bill hasn’t yet been introduced, so details are scanty, but its author, state Sen. Curt Bramble (R-Provo) told that it’s his intention to shield the fetus from “the pain inflicted at the time that that unborn child’s life is taken.”

It’s a specious contention that runs contrary to a 2010 report by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). After reviewing scientific evidence, the RCOG Working Party found no research to support the notion that a fetus feels pain prior to 24 weeks’ gestation. The group did not recommend anesthesia before that point in gestation.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:


A scientific review of evidence published in 2005 in the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that fetal perception of pain is unlikely before the third trimester. Most abortion care—89 percent—occurs in the first trimester, according to the most recent figures from the Guttmacher Institute, while 1.2 percent of terminations occur at 21 weeks or later.

“Because neural connections are not completely formed or fully active, most experts believe that fetuses at less than 24 weeks don’t have the capacity to feel pain, and so providing anesthesia for something that probably doesn’t exist at the point in pregnancy where abortion care is provided would involve unnecessary risks to pregnant woman,” Eleanor Drey, professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, told Rewire in a phone interview. “These measures are proposed in an effort to make abortion care less accessible and to increase public discomfort.”

Montana Republicans passed similar legislation last year that the state’s Democratic governor vetoed. The bill banned abortions performed at 20 weeks or beyond without anesthesia.

Bramble told the Associated Press that his proposed legislation is in lieu of an earlier bill, which he abandoned, to outlaw abortions at a stage when Bramble claims a fetus can feel pain.

Karrie Galloway, CEO of the Planned Parenthood Association of Utah, said Bramble is injecting politics into medical care.

“Obviously, he wants to insert his political opinion in a private decision between a woman and her physician,” she told the Associated Press.

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert (R) told reporters he’d back Bramble’s measure, saying, “Rather than get into the abortion debate, I guess the question is: If we’re going to have abortion, what is the most humane way to do it?”


Vote for Rewire and Help Us Earn Money

Rewire is in the running for a CREDO Mobile grant. More votes for Rewire means more CREDO grant money to support our work. Please take a few seconds to help us out!


Thank you for supporting our work!