Cross-posted with permission from The Colorado Independent.
Campaign mailers underlining the anti-abortion views of Republican state senate candidates Bernie Herpin and George Rivera reportedly landed in some Colorado voter mailboxes last week, stoking flames in the already hot recall elections organized in response to gun-control legislation passed in the spring.
“Bernie Herpin supports a plan that would deny women access to common forms of birth control,” says one of the mailers. “He could even allow police officers to investigate women who have suffered a miscarriage … Vote No On The Recall.”
The Colorado Independent obtained a copy of the mailers sent to District 11, where Herpin is running to replace Democratic Senate President John Morse. The Independent has yet to receive a copy of the mailer sent to voters in District 3, where Rivera is hoping to replace Democratic Senator Angela Giron.
Appreciate our work?
Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:
The Herpin mailer refers to his alleged support as city council member of the “personhood” movement, which seeks to outlaw abortion by granting full legal rights to fertilized human eggs, or “life from the moment of conception,” as supporters put it. Analysts have said personhood would amount to sweeping changes in the law, where countless statutes would have to be reworked and legal interpretations extended broadly and perhaps to absurd ends, where not only birth control would be outlawed but also where activities like drinking, smoking and raw-cheese eating, for example, could turn pregnant women into suspects or criminals.
Herpin didn’t answer calls Thursday from the Independent seeking comment. But subsequent to publication, his campaign told the Independent that, although he is “pro-life,” there is “no evidence” that he has ever supported the personhood movement and that, in fact, Herpin does not support personhood and has never signed a personhood petition.
Groups have tried and failed three times in recent years to pass a constitutional amendment to make personhood the law in Colorado. Voters in conservative Mississippi also solidly rejected a personhood proposal in 2011.
The Herpin mailers come from a group called We Can Do Better Colorado, which first registered with the secretary of state on the last day of July. Registered Agent Josette Jaramillo’s Huffington Post contributor bio lists her as a Pueblo native, county worker, and local public-employee-union president. She has written at The Huffington Post about the politics of reproductive rights.
We Can Do Better’s contribution report won’t be available to the public until the end of September, weeks after the September 10 elections are over. But We Can Do Better is a so-called 527 committee dedicated to addressing an issue, in this case reproductive health, and barred from coordinating with any candidate. Issue committees can spend as much as they can take in and never reveal their donors. The recall elections could well draw other committees in the coming weeks similarly organized around topics like “guns, gays, and God.”
Republican George Rivera, a longtime Pueblo police officer who retired as a deputy chief, brushed off the mailers Friday on Twitter, calling them “desperate” and a “shell game” being played by Giron.
“I make no apologies for my belief in the sanctity of life,” he wrote.
But Rivera takes a hardline stance on the abortion debate, even for a conservative, and reproductive rights are sure to be one of the issues that will concern voters in Pueblo.
Rivera signed last year’s “personhood” petition, called Initiative 46, which would have outlawed abortion categorically, including in cases of rape and incest.
“This provision Rivera signed onto would ban common forms of birth control and would allow police to investigate a woman if she has a miscarriage,” says Jennie Peek-Dunston, campaign director for Pueblo United. “It’s something Colorado voters have rejected multiple times and indicates that he’s just not in touch. ”
“Look, that’s what I believe, but on the other hand it’s not like I’m going to make that a burning issue to present or champion,” Rivera told the Independent. “It’s important, but my platform at this point mainly has to do with the Second Amendment rights and other things that have affected Pueblo, like water and renewable energy.”
Peek-Dunston said the recall election has to be about many issues, because it’s about who will represent all of Pueblo and all of Pueblo’s interests at the capitol.
“I think it shows that there’s a bigger picture to these elections,” she said, referring to the uptick in interest about candidate positions on reproductive rights. “[The elections] will affect a whole host of issues including a woman’s ability to make her own health care decisions.”
In Colorado Springs, Herpin is sure to have to revisit the issue of reproductive rights soon.
“Petitioners are once again seeking to put a ‘personhood’ issue on the ballot, which would declare a fetus to be a full citizen,” the Colorado Springs Independent asked. “What is your stance on this issue and on reproductive rights in general?”
“The personhood issue has been decided by Colorado voters before,” Herpin said. “Under state law, people can choose to petition for it to be on the ballot again. If they do, it will be in the hands of the voters again.”
Herpin’s measured response makes sense for a candidate running on a recall platform that has centered around the right of constituents to express their views on the issues and be heard by their representatives.
But this isn’t the first time Herpin has answered questions about abortion. In a “Pikes Peak Citizens for Life” survey given to city council members in April, he was much more frank. His replies reveal ambiguity, complexity, or both in his thinking on the matter that might make a difficult fit with the contemporary black-and-white politics of abortion. Indeed, the public record of his views are sure to continue to raise questions about precisely what role he believes the government should play in women’s reproductive rights and abortion.
In the survey, Herpin identified himself as “pro-life,” over and above any political party affiliation, and indicated he supported government protection for life beginning at single-cell development. He also agreed that the “government does not have the authority to declare any part of the human family to be non-persons,” an assertion used in a variety of “personhood” petitions.
Herpin also agreed to never vote for nor to appoint to a position anyone who supports Roe v. Wade.
Yet he also said he didn’t support laws, like many introduced around the country in recent years, that would force women seeking abortions to view ultrasounds of fetuses and that would outlaw embryonic stem cell research.