News Sexuality

ELECTION 2012: Minnesota Becomes First State to Reject “Traditional Marriage” Amendment

Robin Marty

The progressive-leaning state refuses to enshrine bigotry in the state constitution.

In Minnesota, by law, the right to marry is accorded only to heterosexual couples.  But for state Republicans who were also hoping to increase voter turnout in a presidential election year, a campaign to change the constitution to legally define marriage as only between a man and a woman has failed, both in turning out conservative voters or in making bigotry permanent in the state.

Minnesotans for Marriage, a front group of “traditional marriage” supporters mainly backed by the state’s Catholic churches, threw their full weight behind the effort (including church sponsored DVDs and illegal campaigning at some election sites). But they began to lose their momentum after one of the key architects of the amendment lost his job after he was found having an affair with the female Republican Speaker of the Senate, and then admitted the whole amendment effort was ploy for increased voter turnout. The issue became even more heated when Vikings punter Chris Kluwe threw his full support (and blog column power) into campaigning against the amendment.

Minnesota voters successfully rejected the amendment in a long, long night at the polls. The Yes vote lead for much of the night, as issues in Minneapolis polling districts left their votes not tabulated until after 1 a.m. But soon after results flooded in, and with over 99 percent of the vote counted the amendment failed to receive a majority vote.

That both a constitutional amendment defining marriage and a constitutional amendment requiring voter ID to cast a ballot is little shock after the state’s full results were known. Minnesota’s Republican party also lost control of the House and the Senate, both of which were won in the 2010 wave GOP election. Now, the state is returning to its solid blue roots.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

News Abortion

North Dakota Set To Be First State to Pass Radical ‘Personhood’ Amendment

Teddy Wilson

Anti-choice ballot initiatives in Colorado and Tennessee have gained national headlines, but a ballot initiative in North Dakota that would have significant consequences for women’s reproductive rights has gotten far less attention.

Read more of our articles on North Dakota Measure 1 here.

Anti-choice ballot initiatives in Colorado and Tennessee have gained national headlines, but a ballot initiative in North Dakota that would have significant consequences for women’s reproductive rights has gotten far less attention.

Measure 1, if approved by voters, would amend the state constitution to read that the “inalienable right to life of every human being at any stage of development must be recognized and protected.” North Dakota would join Missouri as the only states with constitutions that define life as beginning at conception—North Dakota would be the first to do so through a constitutional amendment approved by the voters.

Measure 1, known as the “Life Begins at Conception” Amendment, would give constitutional rights to fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses, and would ban abortion, birth control pills, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and emergency contraception.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

It could also eliminate certain medical procedures such as cancer treatments and in vitro fertilization. Women who miscarry may be subject to police investigations to determine if their actions were the cause.

The latest polling shows that 49.9 percent of those surveyed would vote to approve the ballot measure. The poll was conducted by the University of North Dakota (UND) College of Business and Public Administration, and surveyed 505 likely voters in the state. The pool has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percent.

Robert Wood, a professor of political science at UND who helped conduct the poll, told the Forum News Service that for the measure to be defeated, all of the 17 percent of undecided voters would have to break against the measure. “By and large, there are not that many undecideds on this particular measure,” he said.

Similar so-called personhood amendments have been on the ballot three times in other states: voters rejected the amendments in Mississippi in 2011 and in Colorado in 2008 and 2010.

Recent polling shows that this year’s Colorado personhood ballot initiative shows that the measure isn’t likely to pass, with only 37 percent of survey respondents in support of the amendment.

The ballot measure is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, which means that state lawmakers voted to place the amendment on the ballot. The state legislature passed SCR 4009 in March 2013. It was passed narrowly in the senate by a 26-21 vote, and then overwhelmingly in the house by a 57-35 vote.

Proponents of the measure made no secret of its true intent. “This amendment is intended to present a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade,” state Sen. Margaret Sitte (R-Bismarck) said during the senate floor debate.

Abortion is already highly regulated in the state, and access is extremely limited. Fargo’s Red River Women’s Clinic is the only clinic that provides abortion care in the state, and it subject to significant regulation.

The state legislature passed multiple laws restricting abortion access during the 2013 legislative session. State lawmakers passed SB 2368, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, and HB 1456, the Human Heartbeat Protection Act; both have been blocked by the courts and are being litigated.

Supporters of the measure have raised more than $577,000 in campaign contributions, including $186,000 in contributions from the North Dakota Catholic Conference. Opponents have raised more than $815,000 in campaign contributions, the vast majority coming from the Planned Parenthood Action Fund in North Dakota, South Dakota and Minnesota.

Analysis Politics

ELECTION 2012: The Under-the-Radar State, County, and City Races That Produced Surprising Results

Jessica Luther

On Tuesday, high-profile political coverage in the national media was mainly focused on the US presidential election, some Senate and House races, and a few state ballot measures. Yet there were a seemingly endless number of smaller, less-publicized elections for city- and state-level positions, votes on state initiatives that flew under the radar, and city and county decisions that were only covered in local news.

On Tuesday, high-profile political coverage in the national media was mainly focused on the US presidential election, some Senate and House races, and a few state ballot measures. Yet there were a seemingly endless number of smaller, less-publicized elections for city- and state-level positions, votes on state initiatives that flew under the radar, and city and county decisions that were only covered in local news. I have a collected a fair amount of these at Flyover Feminism, a site for which I am an editor.

Here are a few that deserve more attention:

On the reproductive rights front, Robin Marty has already reported on Florida voters rejecting an amendment that “would have dramatically limited access to safe abortion care by restricting state funding for abortion, though it does not exist, limiting private insurance coverage of abortion care, and stripping privacy rights from teen girls seeking to terminate a pregnancy.” She has also written about Montana voters approving a new law requiring “girls under age 16 who seek an abortion…to notify a parent or seek judicial bypass prior to terminating a pregnancy.”

California passed proposition 35 which should be the object of much outrage, especially from people concerned with bodily autonomy, sex workers, and survivors of human trafficking. Melissa Gira Grant wrote on this issue at Rewire, before the vote took place, that prop 35 was “a misguided ballot initiative that targeted the wrong people for the wrong reasons.” She argued that “advocates for survivors of trafficking, civil rights attorneys, and sex workers fear that rather than protect Californians, it will expose their communities to increased police surveillance, arrest, and the possibility of being labeled a “sex offender” for the rest of their lives.” A judge has already put the proposition on hold. Grant has written a follow-up in reaction to the proposition passing.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

Most people already know that Maine, Maryland, and Washington all voted to extend marriage rights to gay and lesbian couples and Minnesota voters defeated a state constitutional amendment that would have limited marriage to only between a man and woman. Wisconsin electing Tammy Baldwin to the US Senate has also garnered a fair amount of attention since she will be the first openly gay US senator. Some lesser known but also noteworthy elections:

  • In Arizona’s 9th Congressional district, Kyrsten Sinema is leading (they are still counting votes). If she wins, she will be the first openly bisexual member of the US House. She’s a graduate of Brigham Young University and, having left the Mormon church, would be the only non-theist in Congress.
  • The 41st Congressional district in California elected Mark Takano. An educator from Riverside, California, Takano, an Asian American, will be the first openly gay person of color in the US Congress. He was publicly outed by a political opponent in a 1994 race and his sexuality was used against him. He has said about this election, “Times certainly have changed. And in my current race not a single voter has asked me about being gay.”
  • Pennsylvania’s 182nd district elected to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives former footballer Brian Sims. He is the first openly gay person elected to that body.

The city of Troy, Michigan, recalled its mayor, Janice Daniels. A tea partier, Daniels has made a number of homophobic remarks including a disparaging Facebook post and she used homophobic slurs while talking to local gay high school students.

At the same time, there is sobering news out of Kansas. The cities of Salina and Hutchinson both overturned protections in their cities to safeguard against the discrimination of LGBT people. The Awaken Kansas project, which is run by the Kansas Family Policy Council Action, claimed that these cities’ anti-discrimination measures hurt religious liberty. It is not terribly surprising that such votes happened in Kansas since, as has been reported often at Rewire, Kansas is a dangerous hotbed of extreme conservative politics (Koch Industries is headquartered in Wichita).

Hawaii had two momentous elections. First, they elected Mazie Hirono as the state’s first woman senator. She is also the first Japan-born immigrant, the first Buddhist, and the first Asian-American woman elected to the US Senate. Stepping into Hirono’s former seat in the US House of Representatives will be Tulsi Gabbard, a 31-year-old Iraq War Veteran, who will be the first Hindu-American to serve in the US Congress. Well done, Hawaii.

In Oklahoma, voters passed a constitutional amendment that ends affirmative action in state government hiring, education, and contracting practices. This passed overwhelmingly with all but one of Oklahoma’s 77 counties approving the change. Sadly, it appears that most major universities in the state were not using affirmative action in their admission process or scholarship decisions so it’s not clear what kind of impact this will have on education.

In Maryland, voters approved a new law that allows undocumented college students to pay in-state tuition. Undocumented students who have attended community college full-time for two years can receive the benefit of in-state tuition discounts at a four-year university. This law has been called Maryland’s version of the DREAM Act. It is the first time that voters in a popular election have approved this legislation.

On the flip side, Montana voters passed a sweeping ballot measure that denies undocumented immigrants from receiving any state services such as unemployment or disability benefits and scholarships for college.

Minnesota had a proposed constitutional amendment that would have required “that voters show official government identification at the polls.” It was voted down, which seems only appropriate on an election day when voter suppression and long voting lines made national news (to the point where, in his victory speech, Obama said, “we have to fix that”).

In good district attorney news:

  • Los Angeles County elected their first ever woman and their first ever African American to the position. Jackie Lacey, who works under the current DA as his chief deputy, will take over the role of managing L.A.’s 1000 prosecutors. She is best known as the lead prosecutor in the Phil Spector murder case, which she won.
  • In Wayne County, Michigan (which includes Detroit), voter re-elected Kym Worthy, who rose to national fame when she pushed the county to analyze thousands of rape kits which led to multiple arrests of serial rapists.

Finally, in South Dakota, voters stood up for teachers when they rejected Referred Law 16. Governor Dennis Daugaard wanted to phase out tenure for teachers and give them competitive bonuses based on student performance. The opposition to the law was led by the main teacher’s union in the state while it was supported by education reformer Michelle Rhee. In the end, 68 percent of voters sided with Montana’s teachers.

credo_rewire_vote_3

Vote for Rewire and Help Us Earn Money

Rewire is in the running for a CREDO Mobile grant. More votes for Rewire means more CREDO grant money to support our work. Please take a few seconds to help us out!

VOTE!

Thank you for supporting our work!