News Abortion

Georgia 20-Week Ban Debate May Be Contributing To Local Clinic Violence

Robin Marty

The contentious fight over a 20 week abortion ban may be heading out of the legislature and into the streets.

The battle in Georgia’s state capitol over a bill that would drastically reduce access to abortion — banning the procedure after 20 weeks for any reason but life of the mother — has already become one of the most vitriolic debates to hit the legislature.  Now, that vitriol appears to be spilling out into the streets as well.

HB 954, the bill that would ban abortion even in cases where the fetus was non-viable, drew sharp lines between members of the House of Representatives, and not even just along party lines. One lawmaker, the bill’s sponsor, grew so incensed over the debate that he accused expert witnesses testifying against the bill of being liars because he didn’t agree with their judgement.  And numerous Republican legislators who either voted against or refused to vote at all earned themselves a RINO (Republican In Name Only) distinction and the threat of primary opponents by the state’s Tea Party.

But some are concerned that the extreme emotions driving the bill may be leading to more than just harsh words and election challengers. Reports of break-ins and stolen computer equipment in Atlanta area clinics, at first believed to be unrelated to the current debate, are now being examined as potential attempts to intimidate doctors who perform abortions, according to one area Patch site.

“They’re treating us like terrorists,” said Richard Zane, whose Atlanta Women’s Health Center in Sandy Springs was burglarized in March.

Like This Story?

Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Donate Now

More recently, the Georgia OB/Gyn office in Suwanee was broken into. In both crimes, laptops containing member information were stolen.

Zane added that he feels the break-ins were designed to “intimidate physicians from dispensing or arguing about this bill…”

The bill has now passed the state senate as well, and will head to the governor’s desk where it is expected to be signed into law.

News Abortion

Unconstitutional 20-Week Abortion Ban Primed to Pass in South Carolina

Teddy Wilson

The state senate passed the bill Tuesday in a 36-9 vote, as eight Democrats joined the Republican majority.

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) said that she would likely sign an unconstitutional ban on abortion care at 20 or more weeks of pregnancy. The bill’s path to the governor’s desk, however, has become uncertain

H 3114, sponsored by Rep. Wendy Nanney (R-Greenville), would ban abortions at 20 weeks or more post-fertilization unless, in the physician’s judgment, abortion care is necessary to avert the pregnant person’s death or avoid the risk of physical impairment of a major bodily function, other than a psychological condition. The measure’s limited definition of “fetal anomaly” means it would be illegal to abort many fetuses with severe disabilities. Senate Democrats have previously blocked the legislation.

Physicians who violate the anti-choice measure could face up to a $10,000 fine and three years in prison.

“I can’t imagine any scenario in which I wouldn’t sign it,” Haley told the Associated Press.

Like This Story?

Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Donate Now

South Carolina’s Republican lawmakers have pushed for similar legislation before, but Democrats have managed to block their efforts. Republicans were able to pass the bill this year after an epic legislative journey, as lawmakers added and removed amendments and debated the language of the unconstitutional abortion ban.

At issue has been what exceptions would be included in the bill. The current bill allows exceptions if the pregnant person’s life is in jeopardy or a doctor determines the fetus can’t survive outside the womb. There is no exception for rape or incest.

House members amended the measure to include such exceptions after the bill was first introduced in January 2015. The state senate amended the bill and stripped out the exceptions after state Sen. Lee Bright (R-Spartanburg) filibustered the bill, charging there should be no exceptions included in the bill. 

The state senate passed the bill last week in a 36-9 vote, as eight Democrats joined the Republican majority in voting for the version of the bill negotiated by a conference committee of three house members and three state senators.

A two-thirds majority of state senators present is needed to approve the conference committee bill. However, a two-thirds majority of all representatives, regardless of whether or not they are present, is needed for approval in the house.

Two votes have failed to gain the 83 votes needed for approval. The house failed to pass the bill on March 9 by one vote, and again failed to pass the bill on March 10, falling three votes shy.

State Sen. Brad Hutto (D-Orangeburg) told the State that lawmakers have no business dictating to pregnant people what they should do about their health care. “I have faith in the women of South Carolina that they know best what to do when the time comes to make a decision about their bodies,” Hutto said.

Laws to ban abortion at or after 20 weeks of pregnancy with varying exceptions have been enacted in 16 states, and the courts have blocked those laws in three states: Arizona, Georgia, and Idaho.

The so-called Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, based on copycat legislation authored by the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), justifies the ban on the theory that a fetus can experience pain at 20 weeks of pregnancy. The claim that fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks has been discredited by medical professionals.

Hospitals are the only facilities in which pregnant people seeking to terminate a pregnancy at 20 weeks or later could obtain abortion care. South Carolina’s three abortion clinics do not provide the procedure past 18 weeks.

Lawmakers must approve the conference committee compromise bill by the time the legislative session ends in June.

News Abortion

Georgia Follows Virginia’s Lead, Plans to Try to Repeal 22-Week Gestation Ban

Robin Marty

The much maligned and now court embroiled so-called "fetal pain" ban in Georgia probably won't be overturned, but Democrats will give it a try.

The battle over the so-called “fetal pain” ban in George during the 2012 legislature was one of the ugliest state fights of the year. It was so heated that votes turned into fistfights, one legislator threatened to kill it off rather than allow an exception for doomed pregnancies, and some speculate the debate could have been responsible for the rash of provider firebombings that occurred over the summer.

Now, that passionate debate could be coming back for a second round. Although the bill is currently being challenged by the Georgia ACLU and has been blocked into going into effect, some state lawmakers are eager to propose a bill to repeal the law all together.

According to the Atlanta Journal Constitution, Senator Nan Orrock will introduce a bill to repealing the ‘fetal pain’ bill that the Legislature passed last year, reducing the period during which a woman can seek an abortion to 22 weeks.” Orrock was responsible for the protests of the bill on the legislative floor when they passed, calling abortion restrictions part of “an ideological battle that’s being waged to make women a target, to take our access to our Constitutional right of privacy and also our ability to make our health decisions with our doctor and our own best judgment.”

First Virginia, now Georgia. Come on, states, who is next?

Like This Story?

Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Donate Now