News Abortion

Anti-Choice Protesters: Welcome Back, Middle Schoolers! Look at the Bloody Fetuses!

Robin Marty

Nothing like sitting in front of a middle school with 8 feet tall "fetus" posters to win supporters.

The use of graphic photos in abortion protests seem to be spreading this year, and now are interested in targeting even younger ages.  A group of protesters in Rockville, Maryland thought that 8 feet tall graphic bloody “fetus” images were an appropriate way to welcome middle schoolers to a new school year.

Via Rockville Patch:

Anti-abortion demonstrators stood at both sides of the entrance to the driveway on Scott Drive, displaying banner-sized photos of aborted fetuses.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

County police officers asked the demonstrators to move off school property, said Officer Janelle Smith, a Montgomery County Police Department spokeswoman. They complied, standing on the sidewalk on either side of the driveway. After additional discussion with officers, the demonstrators chose to leave.

I wish I could understand how middle school is too young to show age appropriate diagrams of human antatomy in a comprehensive sex education program, but is just the right age for giant closeups of dismembered fetal remains from alleged later term abortions.

News Abortion

Reproductive Justice Groups Hit Back at RNC’s Anti-Choice Platform

Michelle D. Anderson

Reproductive rights and justice groups are greeting the Republican National Convention with billboards and media campaigns that challenge anti-choice policies.

Reproductive advocacy groups have moved to counter negative images that will be displayed this week during the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Cleveland, while educating the public about anti-choice legislation that has eroded abortion care access nationwide.

Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee for president, along with Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R), Trump’s choice for vice president, have supported a slew of anti-choice policies.

The National Institute for Reproductive Health is among the many groups bringing attention to the Republican Party’s anti-abortion platform. The New York City-based nonprofit organization this month erected six billboards near RNC headquarters and around downtown Cleveland hotels with the message, “If abortion is made illegal, how much time will a person serve?”

The institute’s campaign comes as Created Equal, an anti-abortion organization based in Columbus, Ohio, released its plans to use aerial advertising. The group’s plan was first reported by The Stream, a conservative Christian website.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

The site reported that the anti-choice banners would span 50 feet by 100 feet and seek to “pressure congressional Republicans into defunding Planned Parenthood.” Those plans were scrapped after the Federal Aviation Administration created a no-fly zone around both parties’ conventions.

Created Equal, which was banned from using similar messages on a large public monitor near the popular Alamo historic site in San Antonio, Texas, in 2014, did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday.

Andrea Miller, president of the National Institute for Reproductive Health, said in an interview with Rewire that Created Equal’s stance and tactics on abortion show how “dramatically out of touch” its leaders compared to where most of the public stands on reproductive rights. Last year, a Gallup poll suggested half of Americans supported a person’s right to have an abortion, while 44 percent considered themselves “pro-life.”

About 56 percent of U.S. adults believe abortion care should be legal all or most of the time, according to the Pew Research Center’s FactTank.

“It’s important to raise awareness about what the RNC platform has historically endorsed and what they have continued to endorse,” Miller told Rewire.

Miller noted that more than a dozen women, like Purvi Patel of Indiana, have been arrested or convicted of alleged self-induced abortion since 2004. The billboards, she said, help convey what might happen if the Republican Party platform becomes law across the country.

Miller said the National Institute for Reproductive Health’s campaign had been in the works for several months before Created Equal announced its now-cancelled aerial advertising plans. Although the group was not aware of Created Equal’s plans, staff anticipated that intimidating messages seeking to shame and stigmatize people would be used during the GOP convention, Miller said.

The institute, in a statement about its billboard campaign, noted that many are unaware of “both the number of anti-choice laws that have passed and their real-life consequences.” The group unveiled an in-depth analysis looking at how the RNC platform “has consistently sought to make abortion both illegal and inaccessible” over the last 30 years.

NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio last week began an online newspaper campaign that placed messages in the Cleveland Plain Dealer via Cleveland.com, the Columbus Dispatch, and the Dayton Daily News, NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio spokesman Gabriel Mann told Rewire.

The ads address actions carried out by Created Equal by asking, “When Did The Right To Life Become The Right To Terrorize Ohio Abortion Providers?”

“We’re looking to expose how bad [Created Equal has] been in these specific media markets in Ohio. Created Equal has targeted doctors outside their homes,” Mann said. “It’s been a very aggressive campaign.”

The NARAL ads direct readers to OhioAbortionFacts.org, an educational website created by NARAL; Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio; the human rights and reproductive justice group, New Voices Cleveland; and Preterm, the only abortion provider located within Cleveland city limits.

The website provides visitors with a chronological look at anti-abortion restrictions that have been passed in Ohio since the landmark decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973.

In 2015, for example, Ohio’s Republican-held legislature passed a law requiring all abortion facilities to have a transfer agreement with a non-public hospital within 30 miles of their location. 

Like NARAL and the National Institute for Reproductive Health, Preterm has erected a communications campaign against the RNC platform. In Cleveland, that includes a billboard bearing the message, “End The Silence. End the Shame,” along a major highway near the airport, Miller said.

New Voices has focused its advocacy on combatting anti-choice policies and violence against Black women, especially on social media sites like Twitter.

After the police killing of Tamir Rice, a 12-year-old Black boy, New Voices collaborated with the Repeal Hyde Art Project to erect billboard signage showing that reproductive justice includes the right to raise children who are protected from police brutality.

Abortion is not the only issue that has become the subject of billboard advertising at the GOP convention.

Kansas-based environmental and LGBTQ rights group Planting Peace erected a billboard depicting Donald Trump kissing his former challenger Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) just minutes from the RNC site, according to the Plain Dealer.

The billboard, which features the message, “Love Trumps Hate. End Homophobia,” calls for an “immediate change in the Republican Party platform with regard to our LGBT family and LGBT rights,” according to news reports.

CORRECTION: A version of this article incorrectly stated the percentage of Americans in favor of abortion rights. 

News Abortion

D.C. School Sues Anti-Choice Protesters for Allegedly Harassing Students

Sofia Resnick

A lawsuit alleges that anti-choice protesters stood in front of the school and yelled at students that a future Planned Parenthood clinic “kills kids next door.”

A public charter school in Washington, D.C., is suing a handful of people who have for months protested the construction of a Planned Parenthood clinic that neighbors elementary and middle school campuses.

School officials have accused the demonstrators of harassing students and parents in front of the school on several occasions. Meanwhile, many of the defendants say the allegations are exaggerated and in some cases false.

Two Rivers Public Charter School filed the complaint on Wednesday in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. The lawsuit lists six defendants but only five by name, including Robert Weiler Jr., who in 2006 was sentenced to five years in prison for plotting to bomb and shoot up a Maryland abortion clinic.

“Laid bare, Defendants’ plan is to stop the construction of the adjacent Planned Parenthood facility by engaging in a concerted effort to aggressively confront students, harm their emotional well-being, upset their parents and guardians, and ultimately damage the school’s reputation within the community,” reads the complaint.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

The school seeks injunctive relief “to prevent Defendants’ extreme and outrageous conduct” and is asking the court to bar defendants from demonstrating within a “reasonable distance” of the school during school hours and from engaging children under the age of 12.

The lawsuit alleges that on a handful of occasions, these defendants stood in front of the school and yelled at students that the future Planned Parenthood clinic “kills kids next door.” The complaint also accuses the demonstrators of “exhibiting large signs and gruesome photos purporting to be aborted fetuses” and of obstructing students’ safe passage into the school.

Abortion opponents since the summer have demonstrated the construction site in D.C.’s Northeast neighborhood NoMa, as Rewire reported previously. Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, DC has worked to convert the former food storage warehouse into a full-service reproductive health clinic that offers abortion care by next spring.

The defendants say they are within their First Amendment rights to protest on the public sidewalk and deny claims that they have harassed students.

Weiler told Rewire in a phone interview that the lawsuit is “bogus.”

Weiler held a banner outside Two Rivers elementary school during an early-morning protest on November 16, when parents were dropping off students, according to the complaint. The lawsuit includes a picture of Weiler standing near the school holding a large bright-yellow banner featuring cartoonish images of frowning baby faces and the statement: “THEY KILL BABIES NEARBY! Tell your parents to stop them.”

Weiler, 35, said this was the only time he has protested the Planned Parenthood site and said he did not speak to any students that day. He said police were present and did not tell him or the other demonstrators to halt their activities.

“The only reason I’m named in the lawsuit is to bring a little bit more media attention because of my past,” he said, adding that he no longer engages in illegal or violent activity.

The lawsuit accuses Jonathan Darnel, another defendant—just this week—of jogging after middle school students and forcing in their palms a flier soliciting attendance to a neighborhood commission meeting, to voice opposition to the Planned Parenthood center.

Darnel identifies himself as an independent anti-abortion advocate and has worked for the Maryland chapter of the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, a California-based group that displays graphic images of aborted fetuses at anti-abortion protests. Darnel declined a request for an interview, but told Rewire in a text message that he did not instigate violence against anyone and did not “force” students to take his pamphlet.

“They took them freely like any other person would,” he said.

The complaint includes an email Darnel allegedly sent to Two Rivers administrators, telling officials they would come to regret having Planned Parenthood as a neighbor, listing among other things that Planned Parenthood would try to hook Two Rivers middle school students “on the perverse sexual lifestyle that they promote.”

And, he noted, there would be protesters.

“It means anti-abortion protesters (like myself) outside Planned Parenthood and at the intersection of Florida Avenue and 4th Street, decrying the child-killing that is going on just a few hundred feet away. Many of us will carry images of aborted children to awaken the deadened conscience of the community,” the email reads.

Lauren Handy, another defendant, also contested many of the claims made against her in the lawsuit. Handy directs the Washington, D.C. chapter of the Anti-Choice Project, a national group that advocates against abortion. She told Rewire in a phone interview that the complaint contains “half truths, exaggerations, and sometimes outright lies.”

The complaint alleges that during one protest in late August, Handy and other protesters displayed large posters of dismembered fetuses so students and parents entering the school would see them and that she shouted phrases to students, including a 3-year-old, such as, “Tell your parents you don’t want to go to school next to a baby killing center.”

Handy said the lawsuit conflates different events. At the August protest, she said, it was not a school day and she was showing the aborted fetal images to construction workers and passing cars. She said she has video to corroborate her version of events.

Handy said she and other protesters did stage a demonstration aimed at students and parents on two days in November, to “break parents out of the apathy.” She said they chanted about Planned Parenthood being a baby-killing center but did not display images of aborted fetuses. Handy said she has no future plans to protest in front of the school. She also noted that she did not know Weiler before she met him at one of the protests and was unaware of his violent past.

The lawsuit also names Ruby Nicdao, who works for the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform’s Virginia chapter, and Larry Cirignano, the D.C. representative for the Children First Foundation, which sponsors specialty “Choose Life” license plates and says it distributes proceeds from the plates to anti-choice crisis pregnancy centers and maternity homes.

The D.C. government is treating these allegations seriously. Security guards checked bags at the neighborhood commission meeting advertised in Darnel’s fliers this week, something they don’t normally do. One of the commissioners, Christopher Miller, donned a bright-pink “I Stand With Planned Parenthood” T-shirt throughout the meeting, which was attended by dozens of activists opposing the new clinic.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) told The Washington Post that she is working with Two Rivers school officials and police to protect the students and the community. And D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine told the Post his office would investigate and prosecute any illegal conduct.

Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, DC has applauded the charter school for filing the complaint, calling protesters’ actions targeting students “inappropriate” and “shameful.”

“This shameful tactic is a desperate attempt by protesters to halt construction on Planned Parenthood’s new health center and administrative headquarters in Northeast D.C.,” Dr. Laura Meyers, CEO of the D.C. Planned Parenthood affiliate, said in a statement. “It’s flatly inappropriate for protestors to involve small children in an adult conversations by screaming at them and showing graphic images that are clearly inappropriate—and downright scary—for children as they come and go from school.”

The lawsuit identifies six protesters, but the injunction would extend to organizations or people who “act in concert with the Defendants” and engage in similar behavior.

Other activists protesting the new Planned Parenthood are concerned by the lawsuit’s broad language, such as the Rev. Pat Mahoney. This summer, the Presbyterian minister founded Abortion-Free DC, a loose network of activists who have staged protests and prayer vigils in front of the construction site and leaned on local contractors to abandon the project.

However, Mahoney told Rewire that he has always instructed activists meeting with his group not to engage students or teachers at Two Rivers, and not to display signs with graphic images. Mahoney said he agrees with Two Rivers that Weiler’s presence near the school is concerning given his violent history. He said he thinks the majority of the actions outlined in the complaint describe protected free speech, albeit “a violation of common sense and decency.”

“Our concern is that that sidewalk in front of Planned Parenthood remains open to peaceful First Amendment activities,” he said.

credo_rewire_vote_3

Vote for Rewire and Help Us Earn Money

Rewire is in the running for a CREDO Mobile grant. More votes for Rewire means more CREDO grant money to support our work. Please take a few seconds to help us out!

VOTE!

Thank you for supporting our work!