‘Motherhood Politics’ Hijacked Healthcare Debate

Special Report: COVID-19

Your Reading List

Use quotes to search for exact phrases. Use AND/OR/NOT between keywords or phrases for more precise search results.

‘Motherhood Politics’ Hijacked Healthcare Debate

Wendy Norris

Instead of looking at the areas of most importance to all of us on healthcare, the conversation is hijacked by this central concern about whether women are going to continue to choose to be mothers, says Marie Wilson of The White House Project.

Wendy Norris of Rewire conducted an interview with Marie Wilson, the founder and president of The White House Project and former president of the Ms. Foundation.  We’ll post the White House Project’s Denver panel
discussion on leadership with women in business, academia, media and faith as
soon as it becomes available. 

Wilson is calling a spade a spade. As she sees it, the overheated debate over
abortion is being used as a convenient foil for healthcare reform in order to
avoid a much more controversial cultural issue — the role of women in
contemporary American society.

That unspoken and still radioactive debate 77
years after the Equal Rights Amendment was first introduced in Congress in 1923
continues to fuel traditional notions of a woman’s place in the boardroom and
the bedroom.

Wilson, the founder and president of nonpartisan The White House Project, was
in Denver, Colo., recently to discuss the organization’s new comprehensive
study, Benchmarking
Women’s Leadership

Get the facts delivered to your inbox.

Want our news sent to you every week?


But to achieve the critical mass of women in
positions of authority, we need to move beyond the artificial restrictions of
gender stereotypes to a nation that fully benefits from the talents of its best
and brightest in the executive suite, at the lectern and in the pulpit.

Rewire sat down with Wilson to talk
about the challenges of nurturing women’s leadership in the wake of the
divisive Congressional healthcare reform debate.

Rewire: The
concept of healthcare reform has been so mutilated by politicians, religious
interests and the media that it’s not even recognizable to the American public.
Essentially, it’s become a debate about abortion over any other issue. But what
strikes me is that we really haven’t heard from women in leadership positions
other than the pro-choice caucus. How can we bring in more women’s voices to
broaden the dialogue around healthcare reform?

MW: Part
of why we haven’t heard from more women is for years — and it’s not an accident
— choice was chosen as the issue to unravel. It was chosen because of the
concern that Americans don’t address [gender roles], which is what Kristin
Luker wrote about years ago, in Abortion
and the Politics of Motherhood.

of looking at the areas of most importance to all of us on healthcare, the
conversation is hijacked by this central concern about whether women are going
to continue to choose to be mothers. In my experience, political men don’t
understand this. They really think it is about unborn life. That is not the
truth. This is really about the role of women in America. We’re not seen as
important enough people to have had the right wing revolve around us. But we

I studied family therapy for awhile and the most
important time you spend with a family if you want to change that system is in
identifying the problem correctly.

Ninety percent of healthcare is provided by women
in the home. So, perhaps, the experts on this issue should actually talk to the
American public about pre-existing conditions and whether we should have a
universal payer system because we’re the ones doing it. We need to tell [those
hijacking the real issue] to step aside.

Rewire: Who do
you think is an authentic voice to deliver that kind of message because
Americans are not getting it?

don’t think it’s a "who" but a how many of us are willing to say
this. Motherhood is sacred. How many of us are willing to get out and say this
is not at all about abortion. This is about whether we’re going to be mothers.
For men to understand this all of us need to join in on it. Too much of the
rhetoric is about abortion and not enough about women and our roles in this
country. And we better get off of it or we’re not going to have a country left.

Rewire: While
the debate was completely diverted to abortion we’re not talking about equity
in the workplace, academic opportunities, business leadership and all the other
cultural expectations that are still crystallizing around the concept of
motherhood. But we fail to recognize that women have juggled multiple roles all
day, everyday.

MW: Most of the women in this country have never had an
opportunity to do anything but juggle. They just don’t have good places to be
mothers and fathers as long as we avert the real issue — the social-cultural
ideal of women as wife and mother. Going back to Tocqueville’s visit to America
where he said the American people owe their great strides to women but I’ve
never seen women so confined to private life. And it still exists.

Let’s get this thing identified rightly so we can
move on. Nobody calls that spade. It’s not an issue I think women are willing
to deliver.

Show me a woman without guilt and I’ll show you a
man. Guilt has never helped us in the area of race. Guilt has never helped us
in the area of women and childbearing. We’ve got to get over our guilt so we
can get the policies for our children and our nation right.

Rewire: What
is the biggest take away from The White House Project’s Benchmarking Women’s
 report in terms of moving the nation forward from a policy
and political perspective?

Marie Wilson: I think
the biggest take away is how much we really need to focus on holding companies
and communities accountable. And holding ourselves accountable for how we
invest our money, how we buy things. The problem for me, at least, is we need
to have enough women in. [The report found that a critical mass of women in
leadership by achieving board/executive compositions of] 33 percent
makes it normal and allows change to happen. But in order for us to get those
women in we have to have support from men and we have to have women to join.

Those are not small issues. The take away is that
we know what to do but it takes the political will to do it.

Rewire: Now
that the report is complete, what’s the one industry or two that you really
want to dig into a little further? Is there something that stood out that makes
you say I want to know more about this?

MW: Because of the economic crisis, I continue to think
getting more women into leadership in business and finance is crucial.

We have to get global companies that are leaders,
even in their weakened state, to take this on. If we don’t get more women into
these businesses to change what profit is and what bottom lines are we won’t
change what happens in international security and all the other sectors.

I think politics, business and media are the three
[sectors] where we have to keep digging in.

Rewire: American
society — primarily politics, business and the media — have always considered
"women’s issues" as a ghettoized topic. Now with the economy in
tatters these issues are more important than ever. How do we turn those tables
and get people to take healthcare, family leave, education and economic equity
more seriously?

MW: Obama
is being criticized around healthcare reform because he didn’t make it an
economic issue. Frankly, women have always known it was an economic issue
because we have borne the brunt of healthcare. So part of what happens when a
sector becomes important — whether women have been the leaders in it or the
people who have most cared about it, like education, health and the environment
— the things that are now coming up are the things that have been "women’s
issues" for years.

And now they are the economic issues. Women have
to continue to say we’re the experts. You’re seeing it in these Pew Surveys
that are coming out on how they trust women as much or more than men on some of
these issues. Economic security is one that women have had to take on for
years. We just have to own them.

Rewire: So
why does the president appear to be retreating from the bold leadership many
Americans expected of him?

really feel part of this issue is his attempts to bridge this really divisive
partisan gap. That has been what’s both inspiring and his downfall.

What you want to do in any course of action is
choose the action with the most promising outcomes. I think what action he
committed to and chose was one of being hands off and not going in and muscling
[legislation] through. And giving both parties the chance actually do this
together. I’m afraid betting on the most interesting and positive outcomes cost
him. I really do. But it was a good try.

When you have people on one side saying "Ah,
this will kill our president. This will ruin our president" and people on
the other side saying "Well, I’m not voting for this I won’t get
elected" you have lost the whole meaning of what it means to be a public