Weekly Pulse: Joe Lieberman and the Opt-Out Revolution

Lindsay E. Beyerstein

Progressives rejoiced when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced this week that the final Senate health care bill would include a public option. But the jubilation was short-lived

This article is printed in partnership with The Media Consortium, of which Rewire is a member organization.  It first appeared here.

Progressives rejoiced when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
announced this week that the final Senate health care bill would
include a public option. The announcement was a major victory for
left-wing Democrats.

Better yet, it would be a public option without a trigger. Earlier
proposals called for a triggered public option which would only take
effect if private insurers failed to bring down costs on their own.
Under the opt-out compromise, the public option would come on line
automatically (albeit not until 2013), but states would later have the
option of quitting.

The jubilation was short-lived. Alex Koppelman of Salon explains:

Appreciate our work?

Rewire is a non-profit independent media publication. Your tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.


Progressives didn’t even get 24 hours to celebrate the
victory they won in getting Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to
include a version of the public option in his health care reform bill.
The celebration was cut off Tuesday afternoon with the news that Sen.
Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., will vote with Senate Republicans to filibuster
the legislation.

The Democrats have 60 Senate votes. If they all vote for cloture, a
procedural motion to stop debate, the Republicans can’t filibuster the
bill. The Senators who vote for cloture can still vote against the
bill. Reid’s strategy for passing the bill was to get all Democrats to
vote for cloture and let them vote their conscience on the actual bill.
Even without Lieberman, Democrats have the votes to pass the bill by
majority vote if they can avoid a filibuster.

Health care is the most important domestic policy initiative of the Obama administration. Would Joe Lieberman really torpedo reform? The Senate leadership thinks Reid is bluffing, according to Steve Benen at the Washington Monthly.

I understand the argument. Lieberman loves attention and
power. By threatening to join the Republican filibuster, he gets
both—Democrats have to scramble to make him happy, since there’s no
margin for error in putting together 60 votes. Lieberman gets to feel
very important for the next several weeks by making this threat less
than 24 hours after Harry Reid stated his intentions, but that doesn’t
necessarily mean he wants to be known forever as The Senator Who Killed
Health Care Reform.

I find it very easy to believe, however, that Lieberman is capable
of doing just that. He left himself some wiggle room, but not when it
comes to the public option—he’s against it, no matter what, even with
all of the compromises thrown in.

In other words, if this is all a ploy for leverage, why would
Lieberman open by swearing that he won’t support a bill with a public
option? You’d think he’d just say he was keeping his options open and
force Reid to make him a counter-offer. Reid has already decided that
the public option is politically non-negotiable. He’s afraid that the
base won’t come out for the 2012 elections if they don’t get what they
want. Benen speculates that Lieberman wants to be the Senator Who
Killed Health Care because he wants to drum up massive Republican
support for his 2012 reelection bid. On this theory, Lieberman is
joining Rep. Joe “You Lie!” Wilson (R-SC) and Balloon Dad in the quest
to make bank on ridiculous publicity stunts.

Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine)
says that she will side with the Republicans to filibuster the bill “if
she has to,” as Evan McMorris-Santoro reports for TPM. Snowe was the
only Republican to vote for the Finance Committee’s health care bill.

Reid must walk a fine line. The administration really can’t afford
to alienate organized labor before the 2012 elections. Newly elected
AFL-CIO President Ricahrd Trumka continues to push for his three core
demands for health care reform: a public option, a mechanism to make
employers pay their fair share, and no taxes on health care benefits.
Last week, AFSCME President Gerald McEntee said that his union would
oppose legislation that taxed benefits, but Trumka hasn’t gone that
far, as David Moberg reports at Working In These Times.

Finally, in other health-related news, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA), the division of the Labor Department that
oversees workplace safety, has issued a sweeping new report condemning
Nevada’s state-level OSHA program. As I report for Working In These
Times, the investigators found that NOSHA inspectors were being pressured by their superiors to write up employers on lesser charges, even when their repeat offenses killed workers.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about health care by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint. Visit the Pulse for a complete list of articles on health care reform, or follow us on Twitter. And for the best progressive reporting on critical economy, environment, health care and immigration issues, check out The Audit, The Mulch, and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of leading independent media outlets.

Load More

We must defend reproductive rights at every level. That includes staying informed. Sign up for our email list now.

Thank you for reading Rewire!