The “Law and Order” Abortion Disaster and The Wasteland of TV

Sarah Seltzer

The folks at NBC's long-running legal franchise Law & Order must have thought they'd garner praise for their episode on abortion. The show, however, was anything but balanced.

The folks at NBC’s long-running legal
franchise Law & Order must have
thought they’d garner headlines and praise for their  "balanced, thought-provoking " take on
abortion last Friday, an episode called "Dignity" based on the murder of an abortion


But balanced it was not: an episode that was meant to focus on the prosecution
of a cold-blooded murder ended up putting women’s rights on trial–and viewers
picked up on its slant right away.

Immediate twitter and blog responses showed the praise coming from one direction
only. While anti-choicers were quick to heap good reviews on the episode for
so-called even-handedness, pro-choicers and medical professionals were
universally appalled. They condemned an episode rife with bias and medical
inaccuracy. They were hurt by the way the show’s writers turned the murdered
abortion provider character into a literal baby-killer, profaning the death of
Dr. George Tiller which they "ripped from the headlines" to form the
premise for the episode.

Appreciate our work?

Rewire is a non-profit independent media publication. Your tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.


The charge was led by Kate Harding at Salon’s Broadsheet,
who summed up the tone of the episode:

But in an
episode titled "Dignity," Tiller’s memory, remaining late-term
abortion providers, and women who choose to terminate pregnancies are afforded
none. The writers made a weak pretense of "balance" by having two of
the series regulars — Detective Lupo and Assistant D.A. Rubirosa — espouse
pro-choice views, but both are ultimately shamed into thinking they just might
be wrong. See how even-handed?

enraged posts followed from abortion providers who disputed the episode’s
accuracy and expressed offense at the tone of the show:  our own Charlotte Taft and Jennifer Boulanger, a
guest-postng at Women and Hollywood. The cry was picked up by Ms.
, and noticed by Feminist
Law Professors
and even mediabistro. (Many of these posts all delve into
the details of the episode’s plot and explain each offensive moment, so I
recommend reading them.)

The angry responses, and their source, prove that the show’s writers may have
had a strategy. After all, they got the controversy and headlines they wanted,
without facing the ire of the organized anti-choice movement and their buddies,
the legions of "keep smut off my TV screen" reactionaries. Instead,
they just pissed off some feminists. And we know how deeply seriously our anger
is taken by the media.

The fact that Law & Order, a
once-beloved franchise that has now slipped down to somewhere between a
punchline and obscurity, failed to accurately portray the experiences of women
and abortion providers may not seem in and of itself to be a cause for undue
alarm. The episode was buried in TV wasteland, on a Friday night, after all.
And Law & Order has always traded
in stock stereotypes among its legions of thugs, con-men, vixens and victims as
well as a parade of lawmen with hearts of gold and deep consciences.

But unfortunately, this episode is symptomatic of –and contributes to–a much
larger disease, one we’ve talked about frequently at Rewire: the
absolute erasure of women’s real life experiences with abortion from the
pop-cultural landscape. Feminist critics have often discussed the fact that
every single unplanned pregnancy on TV magically ends up becoming a little
miracle for the mother who decides to keep the baby; or if having a child
doesnt’ fit the character or plotline, it somehow ends up as a miscarriage.
Often, there’s cursory to zero explanation as to why abortion is not on the

In this case, though, not only was women’s experience glossed over, but it was
falsified. After Dr. Tiller’s death, dozens upon dozens of credible,
heart-wrenching stories of women who underwent late-term abortions came to
light. These stories, along with the cold-blooded execution of Tiller, even
softened some critics of the procedure. But during the course of
"Dignity" the truth of those stories was perverted, and the women in
question were portrayed as weak-willed, selfish, and childlike. As Boulanger,
Executive Director of the Allentown Women’s Center, an independent abortion and
reproductive health care center in Pennsylvania, wrote:

There were
so many opportunities for the writers to present the humane side of women faced
with complicated pregnancies.  But instead we see respected characters on
a beloved TV series cast aspersions on women.  This is deeply
stigmatizing, even worse than how anti-abortion protesters shame women in front
of clinics every day in this country.  This show did nothing to enhance
the complexity of depth of women’s true experiences and only added to the
sensationalism and stigma that already exists for women facing these decisions.

To me, this movement from pretending abortion doesn’t exist to denigrating women
shows why we need to fight this battle on the cultural front as well as the
political one. TV was already operating far from reality, so it was easy to
twist it further. And Americans, sadly, haven’t always had the best track
record of separating what they see on TV from what actually happens in their
lives, particularly when it comes to shows like Law & Order that offer the lite version of moral
dilemmas.  The secrecy and stigma surrounding abortion contributes to a
society where many people don’t realize that they know someone who has chosen
to end a pregnancy–but everyone knows about that slut on TV and the
manipulative, baby-killing abortion doctor they saw on one show or another.

The wasteland on TV is often caused by advertisers, who are extremely squeamish
about the subject. As the NY Times

Drinkwater, a senior vice president for broadcast television at MPG, a media
planning company, said that most advertisers have clear guidelines about when
they will not advertise on an episode of a show that deals with a topic like
abortion. It is likely that some scheduled advertisers dropped out of Friday’s
broadcast, she said.

The reason
corporations fear the subject is because the wrath of the organized
anti-choicers is particularly potent when it comes to pop culture–after all
this is a closely- linked movement to those who protest "indecency"
for other reasons. They are allied with the forces that brought us Nipplegate,
ridiculous bans on on-air cursing, and bans on adult (read: sexual) content. They are
the modern day thought police.

It’s hard for us non-censorious, free-speech loving feminists to jump on that
kind of bandwagon, but in this case, a complaint to NBC is warranted. The coverage
of abortion on TV is already heading down a slippery slope, and we need to
stand up now or the next Prime-Time travesty will be even worse.

Several ideas for how to contact NBC are circulating.

Michele Kort at Ms. Magazines suggests:
If you want to express your displeasure over this
episode, write to the executive producer of Law
and Order
, Rene Balcer, at 100 University City Plaza, University City, CA 91608.

The Young Feminist Task Force of NY NOW has a
sample letter and a link to contact NBC.

Load More