Backing Up Rhetoric with Funding

Alanna Shaikh

We need to prove our commitment to international women's health by paying our fair share. Rhetoric means nothing if we don't back it up with resources.

As Mark mentioned, we’ve seen a great start from the Obama
administration. It repealed the global gag rule, and reaffirmed American commitment to women’s health and global health. Talking the right talk is exactly what we need to do. Now that we’ve said all the right things, though, it’s time to prove we mean what we say.

Over the last eight years, European governments dug deep to try to replace the funding for women’s health – UNFPA in particular – that didn’t come from the US. If we want to regain our global leadership role on women’s health, we need more than words. We need to prove our commitment by paying our fair share. Rhetoric means nothing if we don’t back it up with resources.

It’s hard to ramp up funding in the face of economic crisis. It’s also essential. Margaret Chan pointed out in February that women and children are going to be hardest by the damage to our global economy.
Leadership in this context means making sure that the programs are in place to ameliorate that impact. That means good planning, evidence-based program design, and a multi-sectoral approach. But more than anything else, it means adequate funding.

This post is part of the After the Gag Rule salon hosted by Rewire and UN Dispatch.

Appreciate our work?

Rewire is a non-profit independent media publication. Your tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.


Load More