Roundup: Two Anti-Choice Bills Advance in Kansas

Emily Douglas

Anti-choice bills advance in Kansas; abortion owner faces criminal charges; the greenest form of birth control; pro-, anti-choice groups react to announcement that Obama administration will rescind HHS rule; affording a bigger family; planning to avoid winter births in Afghanistan.

Anti-Choice Bills Advance in Kansas
Two abortion bills in Kansas have been rushed to a vote in the House,
with the aim, says Kansas pro-choice activist Julie Burkhart, of
forcing Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to take a stand on choice before she is
confirmed as Health and Human Services Secretary.  "The House gave
first-round approval today to two abortion bills that
expand requirements for physicians performing abortions and make it
easier for state regulators to sanction doctors convicted of
misdemeanor crimes," the Topeka Capital-Journal reports.

The Capital-Journal describes the bills:

House Bill 2206 would mandate Kansas physicians performing late-term
abortions to declare the medical diagnosis relied upon to meet the
state’s standard of “substantial and irreversible impairment of a major
bodily function of the mother.” Supporters of the measure say Tiller
has sidestepped the restriction on abortions after 22 weeks of
gestation by submitting vague justifications for the procedure.

In addition, the bill would require the Kansas Board of Healing Arts
to revoke a physician’s license after conviction of any misdemeanor
after July 1 unless two-thirds of the board determined the licensee
would not pose a threat to the public.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:


Under the second bill advanced in the House, a substitute for Senate
Bill 238, abortion providers would be required to inform a pregnant
woman she could receive a free ultrasound picture of her baby. The
offer would have to be made at least 30 minutes before the scheduled
abortion. Abortion clinics also would need to post signs stating women
cannot be coerced into having an abortion.


Both Kansas senators, Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts, plan to vote in favor of Sebelius’s confirmation, the Kansas City Star reports.

Abortion Clinic Owner Faces Criminal Charges
CNN reports
that criminal charges have been filed against the owner of a Florida
abortion clinic where a teenager, seeking an abortion, instead gave
birth to a baby who was then thrown into the trash.  "Belkis Gonzalez, 43, was co-owner of the now-defunct A Gyn Diagnostic Center in Hialeah, Florida.  She faces a second-degree felony count of unlicensed practice of a
health care profession resulting in serious bodily injury and a
third-degree felony count of tampering with or fabricating physical
evidence, authorities said Tuesday."

The Greenest Form of Birth Control

"What the greenest form of birth control?" Nina Shen Rastogi asks on Slate.  There’s lots of interesting commentary on the environmental impacts of the Pill and condoms, with the conclusion:  "All this being said, the Green Lantern has a single piece of advice
when it comes to contraception: Use it. No matter what type you choose,
it’s guaranteed to have less of an impact on the environment than the unwitting creation of a fossil-fuel burning, diaper-wearing
copy of yourself. (For that matter, if you’re absolutely sure you don’t
want children, you might opt for a permanent method of birth control
like tubal ligation or vasectomy.) So if you’re more likely to remember a once-monthly, estrogen-based option like the NuvaRing than you are to keep a condom in your wallet, by all means, choose the hormones."

Pro-, Anti-Choice Groups React to Announcement that Obama Administration Will Rescind HHS Rule

On Slate,
Will Saletan compares reactions of pro- and anti-choice organizations
to the Obama administration’s announcement that it would rescind the
HHS provider conscience expansion.  Pro-choice groups seldom mentioned
that the rule relates to abortion; anti-choice groups seldom mentioned
that the rule could compromise access to birth control.

Affording a Bigger Family

The Sacramento Bee‘s Ask Mr. Dad column weighs in on what a family who wants another child but can’t quite afford it should do.  The advice: "Since plenty of couples have kids well into their 40, being in your
late 30s shouldn’t be a deciding factor. However, the tough economy is
forcing all of us to reorder our priorities and reconsider a lot of big
decisions. And having a second child certainly qualifies. If you’re
struggling to pay your bills now, imagine how much more difficult it
would be to provide for an additional member of your family."

Planning Families to Avoid Winter Births in Afghanistan

The ability to plan families is critical to women in Afghanistan, too.  IRIN News reports "Some
health specialists are suggesting that couples plan pregnancies so that
the mother’s due date does not fall in the cold winter months. This,
they say, will help save lives…Winter poses extra and avoidable health risks to many poor women who
have just given birth and who lack access to fuel for heating and
nutritious food, health experts say."

Other News to Note

March 3: Catholic News Agency: Modified health code would legalize abortion in cases of rape in Mexico

March 3: CBN: Video: Rep. Chris Smith Calls Obama the "Abortion President"

March 3: First Things: The Sebelius Challenge

March 2: Promising News About the Standard Days Method of Contraception

March 3: Delaware Online: Democrats: Beware of Michael Steele

March 3: Catholic Online: Catholic Professors Cheerleading for Pro-Abortion Obama Pick

March 4: IRIN Asia: AFGHANISTAN: Planning a child? Then avoid the winter months

March 4: Phillipine Star: European Union backs Reproductive Health bill, warns vs rapid population growth

Feb 26: Carnegie Council: The United Nations and Gender: Has Anything Gone Right?

March 3: Catholic Online: Brazil: Archbishop Suspends Priest for Comments on Homosexuality/ Contraception

March 3: Media News Wire: Attorney General Hails Move To Rescind Rule Endangering Women’s Health Rights, Including Birth Control Access

News Politics

Missouri ‘Witch Hunt Hearings’ Modeled on Anti-Choice Congressional Crusade

Christine Grimaldi

Missouri state Rep. Stacey Newman (D) said the Missouri General Assembly's "witch hunt hearings" were "closely modeled" on those in the U.S. Congress. Specifically, she drew parallels between Republicans' special investigative bodies—the U.S. House of Representatives’ Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives and the Missouri Senate’s Committee on the Sanctity of Life.

Congressional Republicans are responsible for perpetuating widely discredited and often inflammatory allegations about fetal tissue and abortion care practices for a year and counting. Their actions may have charted the course for at least one Republican-controlled state legislature to advance an anti-choice agenda based on a fabricated market in aborted “baby body parts.”

“They say that a lot in Missouri,” state Rep. Stacey Newman (D) told Rewire in an interview at the Democratic National Convention last month.

Newman is a longtime abortion rights advocate who proposed legislation that would subject firearms purchases to the same types of restrictions, including mandatory waiting periods, as abortion care. Her district includes the University of Missouri, which ended a 26-year relationship with Planned Parenthood as anti-choice state lawmakers ramped up their inquiries in the legislature.

Newman said the Missouri General Assembly’s “witch hunt hearings” were “closely modeled” on those in the U.S. Congress. Specifically, she drew parallels between Republicans’ special investigative bodies—the U.S. House of Representatives’ Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives and the Missouri Senate’s Committee on the Sanctity of Life. Both formed last year in response to videos from the anti-choice front group the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) accusing Planned Parenthood of profiting from fetal tissue donations. Both released reports last month condemning the reproductive health-care provider even though Missouri’s attorney general, among officials in 13 states to date, and three congressional investigations all previously found no evidence of wrongdoing.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:


Missouri state Sen. Kurt Schaefer (R), the chair of the committee, and his colleagues alleged that the report potentially contradicted the attorney general’s findings. Schaefer’s refusal to confront evidence to the contrary aligned with how Newman described his leadership of the committee.

“It was based on what was going on in Congress, but then Kurt Schaefer took it a step further,” Newman said.

As Schaefer waged an ultimately unsuccessful campaign in the Missouri Republican attorney general primary, the once moderate Republican “felt he needed to jump on the extreme [anti-choice] bandwagon,” she said.

Schaefer in April sought to punish the head of Planned Parenthood’s St. Louis affiliate with fines and jail time for protecting patient documents he had subpoenaed. The state senate suspended contempt proceedings against Mary Kogut, the CEO of Planned Parenthood of St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri, reaching an agreement before the end of the month, according to news reports.

Newman speculated that Schaefer’s threats thwarted an omnibus abortion bill (HB 1953, SB 644) from proceeding before the end of the 2016 legislative session in May, despite Republican majorities in the Missouri house and senate.

“I think it was part of the compromise that they came up with Planned Parenthood, when they realized their backs [were] against the wall, because she was not, obviously, going to illegally turn over medical records.” Newman said of her Republican colleagues.

Republicans on the select panel in Washington have frequently made similar complaints, and threats, in their pursuit of subpoenas.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), the chair of the select panel, in May pledged “to pursue all means necessary” to obtain documents from the tissue procurement company targeted in the CMP videos. In June, she told a conservative crowd at the faith-based Road to Majority conference that she planned to start contempt of Congress proceedings after little cooperation from “middle men” and their suppliers—“big abortion.” By July, Blackburn seemingly walked back that pledge in front of reporters at a press conference where she unveiled the select panel’s interim report.

The investigations share another common denominator: a lack of transparency about how much money they have cost taxpayers.

“The excuse that’s come back from leadership, both [in the] House and the Senate, is that not everybody has turned in their expense reports,” Newman said. Republicans have used “every stalling tactic” to rebuff inquires from her and reporters in the state, she said.

Congressional Republicans with varying degrees of oversight over the select panel—Blackburn, House Speaker Paul Ryan (WI), and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton (MI)—all declined to answer Rewire’s funding questions. Rewire confirmed with a high-ranking GOP aide that Republicans budgeted $1.2 million for the investigation through the end of the year.

Blackburn is expected to resume the panel’s activities after Congress returns from recess in early September. Schaeffer and his fellow Republicans on the committee indicated in their report that an investigation could continue in the 2017 legislative session, which begins in January.

Commentary Contraception

Hillary Clinton Played a Critical Role in Making Emergency Contraception More Accessible

Susan Wood

Today, women are able to access emergency contraception, a safe, second-chance option for preventing unintended pregnancy in a timely manner without a prescription. Clinton helped make this happen, and I can tell the story from having watched it unfold.

In the midst of election-year talk and debates about political controversies, we often forget examples of candidates’ past leadership. But we must not overlook the ways in which Hillary Clinton demonstrated her commitment to women’s health before she became the Democratic presidential nominee. In early 2008, I wrote the following article for Rewirewhich has been lightly edited—from my perspective as a former official at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about the critical role that Clinton, then a senator, had played in making the emergency contraception method Plan B available over the counter. She demanded that reproductive health benefits and the best available science drive decisions at the FDA, not politics. She challenged the Bush administration and pushed the Democratic-controlled Senate to protect the FDA’s decision making from political interference in order to help women get access to EC.

Since that time, Plan B and other emergency contraception pills have become fully over the counter with no age or ID requirements. Despite all the controversy, women at risk of unintended pregnancy finally can get timely access to another method of contraception if they need it—such as in cases of condom failure or sexual assault. By 2010, according to National Center for Health Statistics data, 11 percent of all sexually experienced women ages 15 to 44 had ever used EC, compared with only 4 percent in 2002. Indeed, nearly one-quarter of all women ages 20 to 24 had used emergency contraception by 2010.

As I stated in 2008, “All those who benefited from this decision should know it may not have happened were it not for Hillary Clinton.”

Now, there are new emergency contraceptive pills (Ella) available by prescription, women have access to insurance coverage of contraception without cost-sharing, and there is progress in making some regular contraceptive pills available over the counter, without prescription. Yet extreme calls for defunding Planned Parenthood, the costs and lack of coverage of over-the-counter EC, and refusals by some pharmacies to stock emergency contraception clearly demonstrate that politicization of science and limits to our access to contraception remain a serious problem.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:


Today, women are able to access emergency contraception, a safe, second chance option for preventing unintended pregnancy in a timely manner without a prescription. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) helped make this happen, and I can tell the story from having watched it unfold.

Although stories about reproductive health and politicization of science have made headlines recently, stories of how these problems are solved are less often told. On August 31, 2005 I resigned my position as assistant commissioner for women’s health at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because the agency was not allowed to make its decisions based on the science or in the best interests of the public’s health. While my resignation was widely covered by the media, it would have been a hollow gesture were there not leaders in Congress who stepped in and demanded more accountability from the FDA.

I have been working to improve health care for women and families in the United States for nearly 20 years. In 2000, I became the director of women’s health for the FDA. I was rather quietly doing my job when the debate began in 2003 over whether or not emergency contraception should be provided over the counter (OTC). As a scientist, I knew the facts showed that this medication, which can be used after a rape or other emergency situations, prevents an unwanted pregnancy. It does not cause an abortion, but can help prevent the need for one. But it only works if used within 72 hours, and sooner is even better. Since it is completely safe, and many women find it impossible to get a doctor’s appointment within two to three days, making emergency contraception available to women without a prescription was simply the right thing to do. As an FDA employee, I knew it should have been a routine approval within the agency.

Plan B emergency contraception is just like birth control pills—it is not the “abortion pill,” RU-486, and most people in the United States don’t think access to safe and effective contraception is controversial. Sadly, in Congress and in the White House, there are many people who do oppose birth control. And although this may surprise you, this false “controversy” not only has affected emergency contraception, but also caused the recent dramatic increase in the cost of birth control pills on college campuses, and limited family planning services across the country.  The reality is that having more options for contraception helps each of us make our own decisions in planning our families and preventing unwanted pregnancies. This is something we can all agree on.

Meanwhile, inside the walls of the FDA in 2003 and 2004, the Bush administration continued to throw roadblocks at efforts to approve emergency contraception over the counter. When this struggle became public, I was struck by the leadership that Hillary Clinton displayed. She used the tools of a U.S. senator and fought ardently to preserve the FDA’s independent scientific decision-making authority. Many other senators and congressmen agreed, but she was the one who took the lead, saying she simply wanted the FDA to be able to make decisions based on its public health mission and on the medical evidence.

When it became clear that FDA scientists would continue to be overruled for non-scientific reasons, I resigned in protest in late 2005. I was interviewed by news media for months and traveled around the country hoping that many would stand up and demand that FDA do its job properly. But, although it can help, all the media in the world can’t make Congress or a president do the right thing.

Sen. Clinton made the difference. The FDA suddenly announced it would approve emergency contraception for use without a prescription for women ages 18 and older—one day before FDA officials were to face a determined Sen. Clinton and her colleague Sen. Murray (D-WA) at a Senate hearing in 2006. No one was more surprised than I was. All those who benefited from this decision should know it may not have happened were it not for Hillary Clinton.

Sometimes these success stories get lost in the “horse-race stories” about political campaigns and the exposes of taxpayer-funded bridges to nowhere, and who said what to whom. This story of emergency contraception at the FDA is just one story of many. Sen. Clinton saw a problem that affected people’s lives. She then stood up to the challenge and worked to solve it.

The challenges we face in health care, our economy, global climate change, and issues of war and peace, need to be tackled with experience, skills and the commitment to using the best available science and evidence to make the best possible policy.  This will benefit us all.


Vote for Rewire and Help Us Earn Money

Rewire is in the running for a CREDO Mobile grant. More votes for Rewire means more CREDO grant money to support our work. Please take a few seconds to help us out!


Thank you for supporting our work!