They Came With My Body

Samara Ginsberg

We don’t need implants and breast reductions. What we need is to cure our society’s complete obsession with breasts.

I was saddened to read Hannah Whittaker’s article on The F Word
about her eating disorder a while back. I did, however, want to share
the experiences of someone from the other side of the fence. I have
what, for many women, is an extremely enviable figure. If I open a copy
of FHM, the models don’t look like unattainable visions of
tiny-waisted pneumatic perfection. They look like me. With my size 6,
30E frame I could easily be a glamour model if I wanted – although of
course I am probably over the hill at 25. And if I had a pound for
every time I’ve heard a female acquaintance tell me I have "the perfect
figure," whatever that is, I’d probably have enough money for a breast

I must say straight away that I am happy with the way I look. There are
things that I would change if it were easy to do so. I would like to
have longer limbs and yes, smaller breasts. But I quite like my body.
It’s mine and it’s familiar. It’s good at martial arts and playing the
cello and giving hugs. This happiness and acceptance however has been

I liked my breasts when they first appeared. I was a 28A for a long
time and, while I felt a little self-conscious about these new
additions to my physique simply by virtue of the fact that most other
12-year-olds didn’t yet have any at all, I liked them. They were small
and perky, in proportion with the rest of me and didn’t get me any
unwanted attention. All of this changed virtually overnight when I was
14. In the space of about three months, I went from an A to an E cup.
The way I was treated by both people I knew and by strangers completely
changed. My peers began to see me as "slutty," despite the fact that I
had never even kissed a boy. The bitchy, popular clique of girls at
school tried to recruit me, not seeming to understand why I had little
interest in wearing a truly hideous amount of make-up to school and
making other girls’ lives hell. Teachers began to see me as
troublesome, giving me detention for minor things. And overnight, I
went from being able to walk down the street without even being looked
at, to having strangers lean out of car windows to inform me that they
would like to fuck my brains out.

Groping my breasts became almost a sport among the boys at school. It
would happen in class, during break times, while I passed them in the
corridor – any time that I was within groping distance. Typically, a
boy would grab my breasts while his friends whooped and hollered.
Occasionally the friends would be holding me down. I would scream and
hit them, but this seemed only to increase their enjoyment. Nobody ever
came to my rescue: not the girls, not the other boys whose opinions
these male chauvinist piglets probably would have respected the most,
and not the teachers whose job it was to intervene. It simply was not
regarded as important. It was seen as an inevitability of my figure,
and if I had the temerity to walk down the corridors looking like I
did, what did I expect? A boy once told me about a specific sexual
fantasy he had, involving tying me up, beating me and raping me. He
apparently used to crack one out while imagining this every night.
Another boy once asked me, “Hasn’t anybody ever told you a handful is
enough?” as if I’d deliberately inflated them myself.

Like This Story?

Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Donate Now

It wasn’t just the boys. A campaign of complete lechery from one of my
teachers distressed me sufficiently for me to bunk off lessons. He
stared at my tits in class, made lewd comments about me in front of
everybody and, when I lost weight as a result of being so anxious and
upset, chided me because he “liked his women with curves.” When I
finally plucked up the courage to complain to my (female) head of year
I was simply told: “Don’t worry dear, I’m sure he didn’t mean it.”

As I spent many break times hiding in the toilets, the girls would try
to say helpful, supportive things. The general consensus was that I
should be glad of having big breasts, that I should be happy with them
because boys liked them, that perhaps I ought to chill out and enjoy
the attention, and that putting up with groping was just the price I
had to pay for being hot. I don’t lack respect for these girls (they
were after all only between 14 and 16 at the time), but it’s hugely
worrying that their kind words didn’t consist instead of: “You
shouldn’t have to put up with this,” “It’s not your fault” or, “Let’s
talk to the headmaster and make sure the governors hear about this
because that teacher ought to be fired immediately.” My male friends
trivialized the situation, possibly simply fearing the scorn of their
classmates, but, for whatever reason, they were disinterested in
sticking up for me and generally adopted the same “chill out and enjoy
the attention” attitude as the girls. As for the teachers, they turned
a blind eye whenever possible, pretended they hadn’t noticed when I was
assaulted in their classes and did as little as possible when I
specifically asked for their support.

Of course, it wasn’t just at school that my mammary tissue provoked so
much humiliation. As soon as my large breasts appeared, I had to deal
with grown men leering at me, propositioning me and telling me what
they wanted to do to me. I don’t honestly know if I looked much older
than I really was, but as a general rule, I’d say that inviting a girl
in school uniform to provide you with a “tit wank” isn’t really
appropriate. And no, this was not an isolated incident.

My youth orchestra held an annual awards ceremony, one of the awards
being the “Mammoth Melons Award,” for which the girl with the biggest
breasts would be presented with two enormous watermelons and everybody
would have a good laugh about it. Every year I would spend the morning
of the awards ceremony hiding in the bathroom hyperventilating at the
prospect of being so humiliated (I never got the award – either I
wasn’t popular enough or one of my friends tipped off the organizers
about how upset I’d be). When I look back on this now, I’m completely
appalled that it was allowed to happen. Making fun of a teenage girl’s
breasts in an official awards ceremony approved by the teachers is just
not cool.

Something else that made me feel very uncomfortable about my new assets
was the extent to which I was stared at, not just by sleazy men, but by
other women. My breasts were given disparaging stares, envious stares,
and stares whose motivation I couldn’t work out at all. I was also
given some very unpleasant verbal abuse by other women. I very rarely
received compliments about my breasts from anyone other than close
friends – whenever anyone made a comment, it was nasty. Unsolicited
comments I’ve received from other women include “That’s SO not
attractive,” “You do realize they’ll be down to your ankles by the time
you’re 30,” and, “You think you’re something really special, don’t
you?” And, of course, apart from the unpleasant comments themselves, a
lengthy disparaging stare speaks a thousand vitriolic words.

I believe that the reason that so many women feel that it’s acceptable
to mock large breasts is that there is an underlying assumption that
all women want larger breasts. Women’s magazines are full of tips on
how to “make the most of your assets.” In trashy chick-lit novels, the
protagonist with whom we are supposed to identify always has small
ones. Because there is an assumption that all women want bigger
breasts, women who actually do have big breasts are assumed to be in a
state of extreme smugness. And because it’s entirely unacceptable for a
woman to be happy with her appearance, anyone with big tits needs
taking down a peg or two, the conceited bitch.

Therein lies the sting in the tail. As the girl with the oh-so-envious
figure, you will receive no sympathy. If you ever, ever express any
discontent with the unwanted attention and discrimination you receive
as a result of looking like the “ideal woman,” or if you ever express a
dislike of the aesthetic appearance of that part of your anatomy, you
will be shot down with cries of, “You BITCH” (this is a compliment –
confusing, I know). You will be cheerfully informed that you ought to
be glad of the attention. And people will say charming things like:
“It’s a good thing you’ve got big boobs, because otherwise nobody would
like you.”

It’s as if women’s breasts are public property – the bigger they are,
the less they belong to the person to whom they are attached, and the
more it is seen as acceptable to stare, make comments and to
de-humanise their owner. It wasn’t until I was in my 20s that I finally
started coming round to the idea that my breasts were my own, not just
unwanted appendages attached to my body. Until then I hadn’t seen them
as a part of me at all. I had thought of them almost as a deformity.
They didn’t seem like mine. I fantasised that one day I would wake up
and they would be gone, and I’d go back to being treated as a human

Nowadays things are much better. I’ve got better at dressing to make my
breasts look smaller (not that I should have to, although I would
choose to anyway), and looking older means that I get less unwanted
attention (not that I should have received unwanted attention when I
was younger either, and not that I am exactly geriatric at 25). I no
longer feel like a sex object every waking moment. I no longer hate my
breasts and I no longer feel that they’re unwanted appendages. I would
definitely like them to be smaller and I won’t pretend otherwise, but
they feel like part of me, rather than the disembodied udders that they
used to feel like. I’m still not happy though. Why should I ever have
felt that way? Why should I have had to have struggled so hard to be
respected and taken seriously?

It’s incredible to me that any woman would want large breasts when they
examine what the media at large seems to think of women so afflicted.
Just take a look at FHM.
They’re all “hot and ready” bimbos presented as receptacles existing
solely for male entertainment. Even women in high-powered positions
aren’t immune – witness the treatment of Harriet Harman after being
photographed a few months ago from an angle that grossly exaggerated
the amount of cleavage she was showing. Poor Harman. I know from bitter
personal experience just how difficult it is to dress "modestly" when
you have large breasts. Dressing "modestly" means wearing something
that conceals the size of your large breasts – the actual size of them,
not just the amount of flesh on show, otherwise you risk looking as if
you’re actually dressing to make them look bigger. It’s a Catch-22
situation that reaches whole new dimensions if, like me, you are only
5’2” and have to consider that most people will be able to see down
your top.

Because there are such limited representations of women in the media,
and so many stereotypes associated with particular looks, this creates
unfortunate associations for women who happen to resemble any one of
these particular looks. Tall, slim, young women for example are
stereotyped as bitchy fashionistas. Women above a size 10 who – gasp! –
don’t hate themselves are "confident, real women." Overweight,
middle-aged women are regarded as barely deserving of existence until
they give up carbs and get Botox. And young, petite women with big
breasts are regarded as "easy."

My classmate’s “a handful is enough” comment succinctly demonstrates
the phenomenon of people thinking that women choose the size of their
breasts, or at least treating them as if they do. Sometimes I feel as
if I have the words ARROGANT SLUT tattooed across my forehead. Given
what men seem to think about my sexual availability and the judgements
that women seem to make about my "morals" and self-image, it really
does seem that having big breasts is equivalent to this.

I think that the crux of all of my breast-related problems was very
well summarized by a perceptive comment made by a friend of mine when I
was sixteen: “The problem is, your breasts just don’t suit your
personality.” She was right: people had gone from seeing me as I really
was – just another shy, geeky teenager who spent entirely too much time
in the library – to seeing me as a bimbo who would definitely want to
suck their dick. My breasts were a mask that seemed to prevent people
from actually bothering to get to know me.

It seems that often women have the biggest problems with their breasts
when this happens, and when the treatment that they receive from other
people is related to their tits rather than to who they actually are as
a person. All people are to some extent judged on their looks; this is
unfair. Women are judged on their looks much more than men; this is
even more unfair and makes looks-based discrimination very much a
feminist issue. Women with big breasts are in my opinion subjected to
many more negative snap judgements than most, perhaps even on a par
with fat women and women who explicitly fail to comply with society’s
standards of beauty by doing horrific things like failing to remove
their armpit hair. This is horrendously unfair, not to mention bloody

I’m not saying: “Boo hoo, look how difficult life is for gorgeous
women, don’t hate me because I’m beautiful!” Being regarded as
attractive generally makes life much easier and puts one in a position
of privilege, an unfair and wholly undeserved privilege that I am aware
of having. But being seen as extremely sexually
attractive is massively problematic for the individual in question. In
such a deeply sexist and heteronormative culture, looking like the
personification of “sluttiness” is seen as an invitation for sexual
harassment. It’s bad enough when people think you are inviting sexual
harassment because of how you happen to be dressed that day, but at
least mini skirts and high heels come off. Breasts do not. The size of
a woman’s breasts, surgery notwithstanding, is not a personal choice.
Forget “This is what a feminist looks like” – I think I need a t-shirt
that says, “These came with my body."

For any girls or women who think that they would like to look like a
glamour model, I would like to say that you are fortunate not to. Not
because there is anything at all wrong with being petite with big
breasts in itself, but because a woman who looks like a Nuts
pin-up is constantly assumed by most people to be an airhead. Your life
will be much easier if you have a more average figure. Consider how
healthy your self image would be by now if you had endured being
groped, being automatically regarded as unintelligent, being seen by
other women as the enemy, being regarded as nothing more than your
body, every day of your life. You can’t take the breasts off. They’re
not like accessories that you can choose to put on when you feel like
having lots of attention and take off when you feel like being
respected or just simply able to run around without having to wear a
sports bra made of reinforced concrete. For the love of God, why would
you wish that upon yourself?

I have always thought, even as a child, that small and medium-sized
breasts were more attractive than large ones. But were it not for the
judgements, the harassment, the objectification and the pure hatred
that my breasts have caused me, they’d be no different from my short
legs or my frizzy hair – something that I’d change if it were easy to
do so, but which doesn’t really bother me. Things are much better for
me now because I have a good academic career behind me and a
high-status job that explicitly requires intelligence. I have proved
myself as not an airhead. But why should I have to do so? Why should
the underlying assumption be that I am? It’s stupid and unfair and I am
angry about it.

It’s not my problem that my breasts “don’t suit my personality." The
problem is that there is a personality type associated with having big
breasts in the first place. We don’t need implants and breast
reductions. What we need is to cure our society’s complete obsession
with breasts. We need somehow to do away with the idea that breast size
is directly proportional to sexual attractiveness, and that a sexually
attractive woman is somehow deserving of harassment and contempt.
Surely breasts aren’t the only beautiful thing about an attractive
woman? As a heterosexual female I appreciate that it’s difficult for me
to comment meaningfully on what makes a woman sexually attractive, but
really, it’s the equivalent of a man’s attractiveness being judged
solely by the size of the bulge in his pants, which is surely not an
attitude that anybody with any aesthetic taste or basic respect for
their fellow humans would take.

I do still have some residual shame about my body. I know this because
I cringed when writing the opening paragraph of this piece, describing
my appearance. I was shocked at just how much I cringed. After all, I
happily walk down the street every day looking like I do. But
nevertheless, admitting that I have a 23-inch waist and E-cup breasts
(look, I just wrote it again, how brazen!) gave me visions of lots of
angry women scowling at their monitors and fuming, “The stuck-up bitch!
Who does she think she is? I mean, it’s as if she’s actually PROUD of
her goddamn ‘perfect figure.’ Who’d have thought it, Barbie writing for
The F-Word…” I know that this is irrational, but I share my paranoia to
illustrate that, despite the fact that I don’t usually think about my
body much and never diet, I do still have quite a complicated
relationship with my figure and what I think people’s reactions to it
might be. I have cringed at every point at which I have stated or
implied that I am generally regarded as attractive from the neck down.
It feels like an extraordinarily arrogant thing to admit. I feel as if
I ought to be simultaneously raving about having an ugly face or bad
hair just to balance things out. It’s stupid and irrational, but it’s
the way I feel. It’s the way that mainstream, female, male and even
feminist culture seems to conspire to make me feel.

We cannot win. Whatever size our breasts are, there is something wrong
with them. Whatever body type we have, even the most
conventionally-attractive kind, we are encouraged to be unhappy with it
somehow. So quit worrying. Stick two fingers up at society rather than
down your throat. And if you think I’m an airhead, please let it be
simply because you think I’ve been talking complete bollocks for the
last 3,000 words.
"Private Sphere" by Heather Cushman-Dowdee"Private Sphere" by Heather Cushman-Dowdee

This post originally appeared at The F Word, Contemporary UK Feminism.

News Sexual Health

State with Nation’s Highest Chlamydia Rate Enacts New Restrictions on Sex Ed

Nicole Knight Shine

By requiring sexual education instructors to be certified teachers, the Alaska legislature is targeting Planned Parenthood, which is the largest nonprofit provider of such educational services in the state.

Alaska is imposing a new hurdle on comprehensive sexual health education with a law restricting schools to only hiring certificated school teachers to teach or supervise sex ed classes.

The broad and controversial education bill, HB 156, became law Thursday night without the signature of Gov. Bill Walker, a former Republican who switched his party affiliation to Independent in 2014. HB 156 requires school boards to vet and approve sex ed materials and instructors, making sex ed the “most scrutinized subject in the state,” according to reproductive health advocates.

Republicans hold large majorities in both chambers of Alaska’s legislature.

Championing the restrictions was state Sen. Mike Dunleavy (R-Wasilla), who called sexuality a “new concept” during a Senate Education Committee meeting in April. Dunleavy added the restrictions to HB 156 after the failure of an earlier measure that barred abortion providers—meaning Planned Parenthood—from teaching sex ed.

Like This Story?

Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Donate Now

Dunleavy has long targeted Planned Parenthood, the state’s largest nonprofit provider of sexual health education, calling its instruction “indoctrination.”

Meanwhile, advocates argue that evidence-based health education is sorely needed in a state that reported 787.5 cases of chlamydia per 100,000 people in 2014—the nation’s highest rate, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Surveillance Survey for that year.

Alaska’s teen pregnancy rate is higher than the national average.

The governor in a statement described his decision as a “very close call.”

“Given that this bill will have a broad and wide-ranging effect on education statewide, I have decided to allow HB 156 to become law without my signature,” Walker said.

Teachers, parents, and advocates had urged Walker to veto HB 156. Alaska’s 2016 Teacher of the Year, Amy Jo Meiners, took to Twitter following Walker’s announcement, writing, as reported by Juneau Empire, “This will cause such a burden on teachers [and] our partners in health education, including parents [and] health [professionals].”

An Anchorage parent and grandparent described her opposition to the bill in an op-ed, writing, “There is no doubt that HB 156 is designed to make it harder to access real sexual health education …. Although our state faces its largest budget crisis in history, certain members of the Legislature spent a lot of time worrying that teenagers are receiving information about their own bodies.”

Jessica Cler, Alaska public affairs manager with Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest and Hawaii, called Walker’s decision a “crushing blow for comprehensive and medically accurate sexual health education” in a statement.

She added that Walker’s “lack of action today has put the education of thousands of teens in Alaska at risk. This is designed to do one thing: Block students from accessing the sex education they need on safe sex and healthy relationships.”

The law follows the 2016 Legislative Round-up released this week by advocacy group Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. The report found that 63 percent of bills this year sought to improve sex ed, but more than a quarter undermined student rights or the quality of instruction by various means, including “promoting misinformation and an anti-abortion agenda.”

Roundups Politics

Campaign Week in Review: ‘If You Don’t Vote … You Are Trifling’

Ally Boguhn

The chair of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) this week blasted those who sit out on Election Day, and mothers who lost children to gun violence were given a platform at the party's convention.

The chair of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) this week blasted those who sit out on Election Day, and mothers who lost children to gun violence were given a platform at the party’s convention.

DNC Chair Marcia Fudge: “If You Don’t Vote, You Are Ungrateful, You Are Lazy, and You Are Trifling”

The chair of the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH), criticized those who choose to sit out the election while speaking on the final day of the convention.

“If you want a decent education for your children, you had better vote,” Fudge told the party’s women’s caucus, which had convened to discuss what is at stake for women and reproductive health and rights this election season.

Like This Story?

Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Donate Now

“If you want to make sure that hungry children are fed, you had better vote,” said Fudge. “If you want to be sure that all the women who survive solely on Social Security will not go into poverty immediately, you had better vote.”

“And if you don’t vote, let me tell you something, there is no excuse for you. If you don’t vote, you don’t count,” she said.

“So as I leave, I’m just going to say this to you. You tell them I said it, and I’m not hesitant about it. If you don’t vote, you are ungrateful, you are lazy, and you are trifling.”

The congresswoman’s website notes that she represents a state where some legislators have “attempted to suppress voting by certain populations” by pushing voting restrictions that “hit vulnerable communities the hardest.”

Ohio has recently made headlines for enacting changes that would make it harder to vote, including rolling back the state’s early voting period and purging its voter rolls of those who have not voted for six years.

Fudge, however, has worked to expand access to voting by co-sponsoring the federal Voting Rights Amendment Act, which would restore the protections of the Voting Rights Act that were stripped by the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder.

“Mothers of the Movement” Take the National Spotlight

In July 2015, the Waller County Sheriff’s Office released a statement that 28-year-old Sandra Bland had been found dead in her jail cell that morning due to “what appears to be self-asphyxiation.” Though police attempted to paint the death a suicide, Bland’s family has denied that she would have ended her own life given that she had just secured a new job and had not displayed any suicidal tendencies.

Bland’s death sparked national outcry from activists who demanded an investigation, and inspired the hashtag #SayHerName to draw attention to the deaths of Black women who died at the hands of police.

Tuesday night at the DNC, Bland’s mother, Geneva Reed-Veal, and a group of other Black women who have lost children to gun violence, in police custody, or at the hands of police—the “Mothers of the Movement”—told the country why the deaths of their children should matter to voters. They offered their support to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton during a speech at the convention.

“One year ago yesterday, I lived the worst nightmare anyone could imagine. I watched as my daughter was lowered into the ground in a coffin,” said Geneva Reed-Veal.

“Six other women have died in custody that same month: Kindra Chapman, Alexis McGovern, Sarah Lee Circle Bear, Raynette Turner, Ralkina Jones, and Joyce Curnell. So many of our children are gone, but they are not forgotten,” she continued. 

“You don’t stop being a mom when your child dies,” said Lucia McBath, the mother of Jordan Davis. “His life ended the day that he was shot and killed for playing loud music. But my job as his mother didn’t.” 

McBath said that though she had lost her son, she continued to work to protect his legacy. “We’re going to keep telling our children’s stories and we’re urging you to say their names,” she said. “And we’re also going to keep using our voices and our votes to support leaders, like Hillary Clinton, who will help us protect one another so that this club of heartbroken mothers stops growing.” 

Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin, called herself “an unwilling participant in this movement,” noting that she “would not have signed up for this, [nor would] any other mother that’s standing here with me today.” 

“But I am here today for my son, Trayvon Martin, who is in heaven, and … his brother, Jahvaris Fulton, who is still here on Earth,” Fulton said. “I did not want this spotlight. But I will do everything I can to focus some of this light on the pain of a path out of the darkness.”

What Else We’re Reading

Renee Bracey Sherman explained in Glamour why Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine’s position on abortion scares her.

NARAL’s Ilyse Hogue told Cosmopolitan why she shared her abortion story on stage at the DNC.

Lilly Workneh, the Huffington Post’s Black Voices senior editor, explained how the DNC was “powered by a bevy of remarkable black women.”

Rebecca Traister wrote about how Clinton’s historic nomination puts the Democratic nominee “one step closer to making the impossible possible.”

Rewire attended a Democrats for Life of America event while in Philadelphia for the convention and fact-checked the group’s executive director.

A woman may have finally clinched the nomination for a major political party, but Judith Warner in Politico Magazine took on whether the “glass ceiling” has really been cracked for women in politics.

With Clinton’s nomination, “Dozens of other women across the country, in interviews at their offices or alongside their children, also said they felt on the cusp of a major, collective step forward,” reported Jodi Kantor for the New York Times.

According to, Philadelphia’s Maternity Care Coalition staffed “eight curtained breast-feeding stalls on site [at the DNC], complete with comfy chairs, side tables, and electrical outlets.” Republicans reportedly offered similar accommodations at their convention the week before.