Motherhood: Canada’s New Glass Ceiling?

Pamela Pizarro

When it comes to motherhood, Canada may offer some benefits and social programs that American mothers envy, but not still not enough to make having children accessible to all women.

This upcoming Sunday, May 11
is Mother’s Day in Canada. It is a day
set aside to celebrate those women who love us unconditionally and shower you
with a kiss and a hug — at least that is what Hallmark greeting cards tells
me. In reality motherhood in Canada is
easy for some, hard for most, and typically something that women in my
generation are putting off until later in life.

About a year ago, the news-weekly Macleans, devoted an issue to examining what they termed the “new
glass ceiling” for women – motherhood.
In Canada a woman who qualifies for maternity
benefits
is entitled to 15 weeks of paid leave from her job. Additionally another 35 weeks of paternal leave
can be taken by either the mother or father, or can be split by the parents. But this is only offered to those who have have worked
600 hours in the past 52 weeks, meaning that a woman who becomes pregnant with a
second child without going back to work between pregnancies is not entitled to
the same benefits. The amount paid out
by the federal government is a percentage of the claimant’s salary with the
possibility that his/her employer will “top up” or pay the remaining amount to
allow a full salary to be earned during this time. Parents who choose to adopt are eligible for
similar benefits as well. It also offers some sense of job security as individuals leaving their job on parental or
maternity leave are entitled to return to their positions at the end of their
leave.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

So what does all of this mean for
Canada? Our fertility rate is still
dropping despite the fact that these maternity and parental leaves are in
place. Many women still delay their
first pregnancies because they feel that they should first concentrate on their
careers before launching into motherhood.
The situation is obviously much better than it was when my
mother gave birth to me, but compared to some other countries around the world, Canada is
not doing enough to encourage women to have children.

Although I believe that motherhood
should be a choice, it is not a choice when a woman who would like to have kids can
not because she feels that she is not in a position to do so. In parts of Europe, where the fertility rate
has plunged in recent years, governments have come up with new policies to encourage couples to reproduce. In France,
for example, the benefits extended to new parents include simultaneous parental
leave for both parents, a housekeeper who is dispatched to your home for the
first weeks of parenthood to help with household chores, and most importantly
affordable child care when parents are ready to go back to work.

There has been talk in Canada
about creating a national child care system. However, this was essentially killed by
the governing Conservative party which, instead, brought in a "Child Care Benefit" through which parents are entitled to $100 a month – or $1200 a year – in child care benefits.

Are you kidding me?!

A hundred dollars barely covers my monthly bus pass, let
alone child care. Daily rates begin at $40 here in Ottawa, recently voted one of the most affordable cities to live in Canada. In the province of Quebec, where social
services are much more comprehensive, child care is subsidized by the
provincial government and therefore much more affordable. Unfortunately, the demand
exceeds the supply of qualified child care facilities.

When it comes to motherhood, Canada may offer some benefits and social programs that American mothers envy, but still not enough to make having children accessible to all women.

Analysis Politics

Timeline: Donald Trump’s Shifting Position on Abortion Rights

Ally Boguhn

Trump’s murky position on abortion has caused an uproar this election season as conservatives grapple with a Republican nominee whose stance on the issue has varied over time. Join Rewire for a look back at the business mogul's changing views on abortion.

For much of the 2016 election cycle, Donald Trump’s seemingly ever-changing position on reproductive health care and abortion rights has continued to draw scrutiny.

Trump was “totally pro-choice” in 1999, but “pro-life” by 2011. He wanted to shut down the government to defund Planned Parenthood in August 2015, but claimed “you can’t go around and say that” about such measures two months later. He thinks Planned Parenthood does “very good work” but wants to see it lose all of its funding as long as it offers abortion care. And, perhaps most notoriously, in late March of this year Trump took multiple stances over the course of just a few hours on whether those who have abortions should be punished if it became illegal.

With the hesitancy of anti-choice groups to fully embrace Trump—and with pro-choice organizations like Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and EMILY’s List all backing his opponent, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton—it is likely his stance on abortion will remain a key election issue moving into November.

Join Rewire for a look back at the business mogul’s changing views on abortion.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

News Law and Policy

Federal Judge Guts Florida GOP’s Omnibus Anti-Choice Law

Teddy Wilson

"For many people, Planned Parenthood is the only place they can turn to,” said Barbara Zdravecky, president and CEO of the Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida. “We may be the only place they can go in their community, or the only place that offers the screening or birth control method they need. No one should have their basic health care taken away."

A federal judge on Thursday permanently blocked two provisions of a Florida omnibus anti-choice law that banned Planned Parenthood from receiving state funds and required annual inspections of all clinics that provide abortion services, reported the Associated Press.

U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle issued an order in June to delay implementation of the law.

“The Supreme Court has repeatedly said that a government cannot prohibit indirectly—by withholding otherwise-available public funds—conduct that the government could not constitutionally prohibit directly,” Hinkle wrote in the 25-page ruling.  

Thursday’s decision came after Republican Gov. Rick Scott’s administration decided not to pursue further legal action to defend the law, and filed a joint motion to end the litigation.

Appreciate our work?

Vote now! And help Rewire earn a bigger grant from CREDO:

VOTE NOW

Hinkle issued a three page decision making the injunction permanent.

HB 1411, sponsored by Rep. Colleen Burton (R-Lakeland), was passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature in March.

The judge’s ruling nixed provisions in the law that banned state funding of abortion care and required yearly clinic inspections. Other provisions of the law that remain in effect include additional reporting requirements for abortion providers, redefining “third trimester,” and revising the care of fetal remains.

The GOP-backed anti-choice law has already had a damaging effect in Palm Beach County, where Planned Parenthood was forced to end a program that focused on teen dropout prevention.

Barbara Zdravecky, president and CEO of the Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida, said in a statement that the ruling was a “victory for thousands of Floridians” who rely on the organization for reproductive health care.

“For many people, Planned Parenthood is the only place they can turn to,” Zdravecky said. “We may be the only place they can go in their community, or the only place that offers the screening or birth control method they need. No one should have their basic health care taken away.”

A spokesperson for Scott told Reuters that the administration is “reviewing” the decision.

credo_rewire_vote_3

Vote for Rewire and Help Us Earn Money

Rewire is in the running for a CREDO Mobile grant. More votes for Rewire means more CREDO grant money to support our work. Please take a few seconds to help us out!

VOTE!

Thank you for supporting our work!